User talk:BLueRibbon

A star for you

For all the trouble on Jimbo's talk page. — **$PЯING**rαgђ 14:41, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much :-) BLueRibbon 15:46, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your userpage

I have blanked your userpage per WP:USER which says that you should not use your userpage to campaign for or against anything. Wikipedia is not the place to promote you ideology, not even close. ^High_InBC^{(Need help? Ask me)} 15:10, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am not promoting an ideology, I am explaining who I am and what I believe. I will not be told that I can't self-identify as who I am; your attempt to force me to do such is absolutely disgusting and is the worst kind of censorship. You would not blank someone's userpage for indentifying as homosexual - the reason you have blanked my page is because you dislike my sexual orientation. BLueRibbon 16:32, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have reblanked your userpage for the same reason HighInBC did. I would blank any userpage that promoted any ideology, no matter what it was, if it was in the format and context that yours was. Please refrain from re-adding the same content, and should you choose to re-create your userpage, please make sure it complies with WP:USER. Thanks! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 16:35, April 19

Per WP:USER, "Some people add information about themselves as well, possibly including contact information (email, instant messaging, etc), a photograph, their real name, their location, information about their areas of expertise and interest, likes and dislikes, homepages, and so forth. (If you are concerned with privacy, you may not want to and are by no means required to emulate this.)"

My sexuality is very relevant information about me considering that I only edit the Wikipedia articles related to paedophilia. The userpage does not violate WP:USER and it does not "promote an ideology" (that is what my blog is for), it explains who I am and what I believe. BLueRibbon 16:46, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am not going to quote it, but there are definitly sections of the userpage that try to promote the ideology, put it in a good light and explain it, that is not what it is for. You cant say what you are and then try to explain why it is good and not bad. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 16:48, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the sections of your userpage that promote the ideology, try to push it in a good light. If you want to tell a little about yourself, i wont remove that. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 16:51, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to misunderstand what Wikipedia is. This is an encyclopedia, and not a place to advance a perverted agenda. Wikipedia's reputation has taken enough knocks, and we don't need this. --Rob 15:14, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to use Wikipedia to spread your pro-pedophilia message you will be blocked. ^High_InBC^{(Need help? Ask me)} 15:16, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:USER, I am allowed to link to a home page and describe myself. There are no restrictions on referring to one's sexuality. BLueRibbon 15:42, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And now you are blocked for using Wikipedia to spread a pro-pedophilia agenda. When you are reverted by 5 different users that is a hint that it is not welcome. ^High_InBC^{(Need help? Ask me)} 15:49, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be back with another pseudonym BLueRibbon 15:51, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To quote an old friend of mine, "You better walk right..." --Mhking 15:54, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That is good to know. ^High_InBC^{(Need help? Ask me)} 15:53, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Love ya! ♥♥♥

Thanks for pa-troll-ing the Pedophile_activism article and keeping it clean! Haplolology 13:33, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem :-) BLueRibbon 00:32, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think you should be unbanned unless Wikipedia changes its policy to read "some opinions are welcome but not others". -- Haplolology, a user who has nothing to do with this whole mess except wandering into it by chance thinking it looked funny, and is embarrassed enough now for looking stupid that I want to start a whole new user account

Request for arbitration

You have been cited as an involved party in This new Request for Arbitration. DES ^(talk) 23:14, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{Block of User:BLueRibbon and subsequent events}

Please present evidence and statements regarding this matter directly to the arbitration committee at arbcom-l at lists.wikimedia.org Fred Bauder 23:47, 23 April 2007 (UTC) for the arbitration committee.[reply]