User talk:BIG OL BENDER

April 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Monty ₈₄₅ 00:01, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Monty845: @Tiptoety: This is an illegitimate block based on not even a trial in absentia. You are tyrants and I am the victim. BIG OL BENDER (talk) 00:07, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tiptoety ^talk 00:08, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

- - @Tiptoety: Please tell me; if I am blocked for multiple accounts, what is my other accounts? This is a simple question with a simple answer. BIG OL BENDER (talk) 00:09, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

← Using CheckUser, I discovered that you recently editing via an IP address that was subsequently blocked for block evasion. While I do not know what your original account is, I do know that this is not your first account, or first time editing Wikipedia. Tiptoety ^talk 00:11, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

←← This is a wonderful excuse. I love it. "I don't know what your offense is, but I know someone else has judged you guilty." Admit it, @Tiptoety: you don't know what you're doing here, really, do you? Enjoy your time as a mere unpaid, unrewarded functionary. BIG OL BENDER (talk) 00:15, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

←← @Tiptoety: You seem to be extremely able to 'revert' 'attacks' to your 'encyclopedia' within seconds. Why can't you respond to legitimate questions in a similar timeframe, then? BIG OL BENDER (talk) 00:21, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

←← @Tiptoety: @Jimbo Wales: @Baseball Bugs: @JzG: @Monty845: @TonyTheTiger: It's official. There is no interest in democracy or transparency in Wikipedia. BIG OL BENDER (talk) 00:28, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is becoming even clearer that you are only here to be disruptive. Tiptoety provided a reasonable explanation for the block, the facts of which support a block under policy. If you would like to formally request an ublock, I suggest you do so with {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} before your talk page access is revoked. Monty ₈₄₅ 00:37, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I just revoked it. This account was clearly created for harrassment. If you want to be unblocked, use whatever your original account was to appeal to WP:UTRS or WP:BASC. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:40, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

From what I can tell, I believe this might be Colton Cosmic. The exact same section that this user name added to AN, was added a few days ago by an ip claiming to be Colton Cosmic. See this. -- GB fan 02:29, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In case any of you care whether what you say is true or not, "BIG OL BENDER" is not me. Neither is the IP whose edit GB_fan linked. I see where it signed with my username, however it is just a lying troll. I was unaware of any of this until a couple days ago. I imagine I've encountered whomever it is, and have a suspicion or three whom it might be, but those are just suspicions. For what it's worth, that's the first time I know of that I've been impersonated at Wikipedia. Please checkuser and catch him or her. Catch an actual sockpuppet for once. Colton Cosmic. PS: Please remove it from that completely falsified and bogus category: Suspected sockpuppets of Colton Cosmic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.37.50.206 (talk) 14:35, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]