This is an archive of past discussions with User:BG89. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Warning
If you remove the F5 tags from those files again, I'll block you for disruption and it won't be for a short period. Katietalk20:02, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
All your edits reverts are highly controversial and will simply lead in more protections, edit warring and being "hard" on opposing me with such edits and following every admin who protects it, agitating him in your personal opinion would not work, nor make you a winner, nor will do me anything else. I am forced to revert your edits because they are highly controversial, fan-based and manipulative. On Talk:PFC CSKA Sofia there is still an ongoing discussion, where 3 users have began reaching consensus about the article, only you continue to push hard on your statements to split the article. I will not be tolerating such disruptive behavior and every edit war you start with controversial text will be reported immediately from now on. Once again I am urging you to stop editing, see what we, along with Laveol and Zourich have written. Edit warring is not an answer.--The TV Boy (talk·contribs) 21:43, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
Regarding the PFC CSKA - Sofia redirect, given that you have shown that you are prepared to continue to edit war after the protection ended to recreate the article, please consider this your final warning. If you continue to recreate the article without consensus, I will block you. Establish consensus for the new article. If that can't be achieved through normal means, consider an requests for comment or dispute resolution. If, however, consensus is against your actions, you need to accept that. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 00:38, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Your recent editing history at FC CSKA 1948 Sofia shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.--The TV Boy (talk·contribs) 22:57, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
POV templates
Please stop adding these templates, the case that you think there is a POV in there doesn't mean that there actually is. Presenting personal opinions and opinions on the article can be made into the talk page, were discussion has started, but the templates are irrelevant because you personally don't agree with the information, not that there is something wrong with it or it has POVs.--The TV Boy (talk·contribs) 17:17, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Anything else you might want to copy-paste from me? You simply can't think of anything else to win the argument, so you are now just copy-pasting the things I wrote for you in reports to make me give up or get thrown out. Pathethic. Just like every single thing you do. But there is just no point in writing to you or trying to deal with you anymore, it is clearlly that no progress can be made with you. You might want to use that in the next talk page. Not gonna say anything to you anymore, don't think that I will comply with any of your edits to articles thought.--The TV Boy (talk·contribs) 01:24, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.--The TV Boy (talk · contribs) 15:55, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
