User talk:BCEVERYWHERE

November 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2020 United States election protests. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 03:45, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand your message. How was my edit was vandalism? I gave a clear reason for removing the infobox. Sources haven't described the protests as a civil conflict and if you do that, then it would be undue weight or original research. BCEVERYWHERE (talk) 03:56, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2020 United States election protests; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Love of Corey (talk) 05:23, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

—valereee (talk) 10:09, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tigray Conflict

Can you please make your edit summary more descriptive? There seems to have been some edit warring on the page and 'tendentious editing' doesn't tell us much. Thank you. Praefect94 (talk) 22:41, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was not aware there was edit warring on the page. I'll be more careful with my edit summary next time BCEVERYWHERE (talk) 22:46, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Waskerton per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Waskerton. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ST47 (talk) 00:05, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]