User talk:BBF3
January 2010[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Shalabi Effect (album), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Shalabi Effect (album) was changed by BBF3 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-01-25T18:28:38+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:28, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
Welcome[edit]
Welcome!
Hello, BBF3, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!
The Thing // Talk // Contribs 20:34, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
UVB-76[edit]
Hi. Please note that I have reverted your reinstatement of what is poorly sourced information bordering on original research and certainly not citing reliable sources. In your edit summary you seem to suggest that the lack of proper reliable sources means less reliable sources can be used. That certainly isn't appropriate. Please don't reinstate this content. If you feel it should be reinstated then I would invite you to discuss it on the talk page. Thanks. Adambro (talk) 15:11, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
- You may be interested in the vote. A-Day (c)(t) 23:06, 12 September 2010 (UTC)