User talk:B694kp8d

Welcome

Hello, B694kp8d! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Srikanth (Logic) 13:48, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Shenzhen, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. HXL 's Roundtable, and Record 22:07, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. HXL 's Roundtable, and Record 18:11, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Shenzhen, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. HXL 's Roundtable, and Record 19:23, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Shenzhen. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue.

In particular the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Editors violating the rule will usually be blocked for 24 hours for a first incident.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording, and content that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. HXL 's Roundtable, and Record 22:39, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Shenzhen

With regards to whether SZX or HKIA is cheaper, the assertion that SZX is noticeably cheaper than HKG for flights to the mainland can be less easily challenged than the assertion that it is cheaper for int'l flights. Please remove any wording that implies that int'l flights are also cheaper.

Regarding sister cities, domestic cities (includes anything in TW for the PRC) generally are not included alongside international cities. In addition, the Vancouver article, which is probably well-cited in this area, has nothing to say about SZ being a sister city. --HXL 's Roundtable, and Record 03:20, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Shenzhen does not wish to challenge Hong Kong for domestic or international flights. Flights from Shenzhen are cheaper for domestic and international destinations does not mean that Shenzhen is challenging Hong Kong. Domestic and international flights are cheaper from Shenzhen is added with no reference to Hong Kong.(B694kp8d (talk) 05:48, 15 January 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Regarding future sister cities of Shenzhen, please visit www.shenzhen-standard.com

Some of the sister cities are added because of Shenzhen Air flights to and from that particular city.(B694kp8d (talk) 05:48, 15 January 2011 (UTC))[reply]

ok thanks for your response. I was frustrated because you did not respond, either through edit summary or talk page, to my concerns. Firstly, I was not saying that SZ is challenging HK. I was saying that the statement that SZ is cheaper than HK for domestic flights is more true than the statement that SZ is cheaper than HK for int'l flights. and lastly I'll look at the link you provided.--HXL 's Roundtable, and Record 05:54, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I could not find any mention of sister cities in that link. and Wikipedia articles generally do not include future sister cities—only current and terminated. --HXL 's Roundtable, and Record 06:04, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have never explained anything in your edits, particularly why you chose to remove the "See Also" section. --HXL 's Roundtable, and Record 21:17, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for repeated removal of content without explanation. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:25, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/B694kp8d for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Minima c (talk) 06:33, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Ganzhou, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diannaa ^(Talk) 20:05, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. One or more of the external links you added in this edit to the page Shenzhen do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. You may wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Diannaa ^(Talk) 21:15, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in this edit to Shenzhen. Inappropriate links include links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that serve as advertising or promotion. Thank you. Diannaa ^(Talk) 21:26, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BYD

You removed a section from the BYD Auto page. Please don't make malicious edits; if you have a content issue you can discuss it on the page's "Discussion". Fleetham (talk) 06:05, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Shenzhen. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. HXL's Roundtable and Record 04:15, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Shenzhen, you may be blocked from editing. HXL's Roundtable and Record 20:52, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Shenzhen. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —HXL's Roundtable and Record 03:46, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Syrthiss (talk) 14:19, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Syrthiss (talk) 14:26, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not.

If you are not a sock puppet, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. – GorillaWarfare (talk) 04:22, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]