User talk:Bérangère444

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nakadomari (archaeological site) has been accepted

Nakadomari (archaeological site), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– Joe (talk) 08:33, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hi Bérangère444! I noticed your contributions to Nakadomari (archaeological site) and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! – Joe (talk) 08:56, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Thank you so much for all the improvements you made to the article, and the help links you provided. I tried to search for tutorials, to insert images and the language link to the page in Japanese but I was not very lucky in my tries… I managed to understand how references are working though, that's a victory.

I need to learn how to put the nice boxes on the right of the screen and I do not despair to find a way to insert footnotes.

I'm really glad there are nice people like you to cover up for my shortages! Bérangère444 (talk) 23:06, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kaizuka period (August 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Miminity was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kaizuka period and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 10:14, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Bérangère444! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 10:14, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kaizuka period has been accepted

Kaizuka period, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 02:49, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for writing this article! I'd like to double-check - this is your own new creation and not a translation of an article from another language wiki, right? (If it is a translation, we need to properly attribute it.) I would also suggest collapsing the headings a bit, since it goes all the way down to fourth-tier headings. This will be easier to navigate if you remove "Outline" and bump every heading under that up a level. -- asilvering (talk) 02:56, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for accepting the article. I wrote it myself based on the different sources mentioned. The Japanese article was quite a mess, talking not only about the Kaizuka Period, but also the Palaeolithic, and other Neolithic periods from other parts of the Ryukyu and Japan, and repeating things two or three times in different parts of the article, so that I gave up on translating and thought it'd be easier to write it from scratch instead. We had a lot of conferences about the Kaizuka Period recently so that I had a lot of recent sources.

I'll modify the headings as you suggested, thanks for telling me. Bérangère444 (talk) 03:05, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Great, thanks! -- asilvering (talk) 03:35, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Prehistory of the Ryūkyū Islands

A tag has been placed on Category:Prehistory of the Ryūkyū Islands indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:43, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

Good day,

I put the Kaizuka period page in this category, but I don't know why it won't appear on the Category page. I created another category Category:Prehistoric sites in the Ryūkyū Islands for another article (Nakadomari (archaeological site) ) and the page correctly appears on the Category page. The help page said that the categories should automatically appear in a box at the bottom of the article, which is not the case (I mean, they are at the end of the article but there is no box) so I must have done something wrong, but I am not sure what.

There are at least two other articles to be written for the Category:Prehistory of the Ryūkyū Islands (Neolithic in another part of the archipelago and Palaeolithic), and probably more with detailed articles for instance on pottery or lithics, so I'd rather have it not deleted. Bérangère444 (talk) 07:06, 22 August 2024 (UTC)