February 2009

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Professional wrestling throws. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. Leujohn ^(talk) 12:33, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry but if you mind looking at what I removed you would understand why I did it.--Azihade (talk) 12:39, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Meltzer's ratings

Stop adding his opinions to championships/accomplishments sections. It was agreed at WP:PW that since they are just his opinions (and are NOT championships or accomplishments), then they should be mentioned in prose in the article. TJ Spyke 16:09, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Backbreaker. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. TJ Spyke 20:19, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Powerslam. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. TJ Spyke 20:21, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Professional wrestling throws changes

You recently removed several moves from the professional wrestling throws page, transplanting them to piledriver (professional wrestling|piledriver]] and brainbuster pages. Regarding the moves to brainbuster, the introduction of the article describes a brainbuster as "a professional wrestling throw in which a wrestler puts his/her opponent in a front facelock, hooks his/her pants, and lifts him/her up as if he/she was executing a vertical suplex." How do you believe this describes a Death Valley driver? As these changes are comparable to using the "Move" function on a whole page, it is your responsibility to edit the pages of every wrestler whose move list you have affected and edit their pages in order to have functional links (e.g., Kenny King's Coronation, Matt Sydal's Here It Is Driver). -WikiFew (talk) 02:06, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add moves without providing a reliable source to prove their existence in professional wrestling and their notability. Otherwise entries will be considered original research and will be removed on sight. Thanks. Nikki♥311 19:59, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Your recent edit to the page Christopher Bauman appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any other tests that you wish to take. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Please don't change sourced information, without providing a different source to back yourself up, or remove references from articles. Thanks, ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 19:46, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DDT

Please stop adding original research to articles, such as you did to the DDT page. When adding something new, please provide a source to prove that it is indeed a real move and not something you made up in your backyard one day. This is how Wikipedia works...anything without a source can be challenged and removed. By repeatedly adding it back without providing a reliable source, you are being disruptive and may be blocked from editing. Nikki♥311 02:27, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Nick Nemeth, you will be blocked from editing. Please do not remove sourced information, such as moves, from articles as you did in your recent edit. In addition, do not add unsourced move names or incorrect information (putting "- FCW" after a move to imply it was only used in FCW when the source is a review of a SmackDown episode is deliberately introducing incorrect information) to articles. Such behaviour can result in you being blocked for disruption. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 13:34, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]