User talk:Az1568/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Vandalism revert

You're welcome. Best, Gwernol 22:16, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Not quite sure what I did

I was having trouble adding the picture that I wanted to add but I thought in the end I did the job fine and I even checked teh page afterwards. I'm not quite sure what you removed but the way the Tsing Ma bridge page looks now is exactly what I intended. The picture I wanted to add is there.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Snaveed (talk • contribs) .

User pages

Well, the policy in this area is WP:NOT, particularly Wikipedia is not a free host. In general most editors are more lenient about user page content than articles, but WP:UP makes it clear that the user page is for Wikipedia-related activity and is not a general homepage or blog. Of course this is something of a judgement call, but when it gets bad its appropriate to warn the user concerned, citing the WP:NOT policy and if they refuse to cleanup their userpage, then it can be done for them by any editor (see also WP:OWN). This often leads to disputes though, so if this can be handled tactfully and collaboratively rather than forcefully the outcome is usually better.

If you'd like me to take a look at a specific instance, I'd be happy to. Best, Gwernol 21:12, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Consider another username

You might consider changing your username; usernames consisting only of numbers are generally harder to remember, which makes it harder for other people to associate your contributions with you, which is one of the purposes of having an account. This is not a requirement, or a warning, just a suggestion. JesseW, the juggling janitor 00:08, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Brain Candy

I in no way added "nonsense" to the Brain Candy article. If you're going to throw something like that out there, an example please? --72.227.81.95 05:54, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you very much!

☺ Thank you for your efforts in reverting vandalism, especially to the ones on my userpage. It was a mischievous classmate of mine who did it. Thanks anyway.--Tdxiang Jimbo's 40th Birthday! 09:02, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting

Thank you for reverting vandalism on my user page. ... discospinster _talk 01:10, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Edit summary

Hi - I like the look of the anti spam line in it. When you've time and if it isn't a state secret I'd like to know how. Either way keep up the good work - cheers --Nigel ^(Talk) 09:18, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks I'll take a look - --Nigel ^(Talk) 09:26, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

VP 1.3

Good to go! Take a look at User:GIen/VP.1.3 and let me know if I can help further. Enjoy! - GIen 00:38, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Sardar Mahtab Ahmed Khan

I did not bloody experiment with the page. IT's a DUPLICATE ARTICLE. Sardar Mehtab Ahmed Khan is the correctly named article.

132.205.93.88 02:54, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Mind removing the experimentation notice from my talk page? As you've reimplemented my version of the page, I think it would only be appropriate to remove it. However, I've just gotten into trouble for removing it by admin user:Brat32, because of a policy I did not know about, and Brat32 kindly did not leave a pointer to. 132.205.93.88 04:29, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my user's page. Daniel's page ☎ 03:05, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Along the same lines, thanks for saving my user page from libel, and the anonymous user who dared to slander the supposed size of my genitalia. Female Wikipedians everywhere may breathe a sigh of relief. Thanks for the patrol!--BigCow 04:14, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Harbourcoat says

Got enough Userboxes lol Harbourcoat 15:51, 23 August 2006 (UTC) I say add a user cube lol

Revert

Sorry for reverting over you on User talk:12.109.22.226. It wasn't intentional. Cheers. Canadian-Bacon ^(contribs) 04:39, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism

Just FYI, a content dispute is not vandalism. – ClockworkSoul 06:40, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

The user who made the complaint withdrew it, was deleting the warnings which I did not recommended based on this? Please clarify.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 190.40.230.219 (talk • contribs) .

Re: Thanks!

Anytime, just manning the trenches. Cheers. Canadian-Bacon ^(contribs) 05:05, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Indefblcoked accounts

Please do not create userpages for blocked accounts with nil or few edits. It serves no userful purpose and only encourages the vandal. Thanks. --Doc 18:56, 28 August 2006 (UTC)