User talk:Aynf224

June 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Jhelum District have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Jhelum District was changed by Aynf224 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.899445 on 2023-06-26T10:04:23+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:04, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Hello, Aynf224, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you.

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Jhelum District, you may be blocked from editing.
As already explained Google searches are not reliable sources - Arjayay (talk) 10:04, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Arjayay, for guidance. I want to learn so please send me Wikipedia tutorials or video links.

Thanks

Aynf224 Aynf224 (talk) 05:30, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Athar Tahir, you may be blocked from editing.
Please note YouTube is not a WP:reliable source and you have already been asked not to add External links in the body of articles at User talk:Ayn224 - Arjayay (talk) 15:14, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Arjayay, for guidance. I want to learn so please send me Wikipedia tutorials or video links.

Note: Ayn224 was written by mistake alongwith the email.

My correct and personal user id is Aynf224. Please note it.

Thanks

Aynf224 Aynf224 (talk) 05:35, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Aynf224/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:40, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

No worries, I am glad to get your supportive guidance. I am really want to learn wikipedia article writing.

I will abide by your instructions.

Sincerely,

Aynf224 Aynf224 (talk) 02:59, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aynf224! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:40, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

No worries, I am glad to getyour dupportive guidance. I am really want to learn wikipedia article writing.

I will abide by your instructions.

Sincerely,

Aynf224 Aynf224 (talk) 02:57, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

Looks like there are two different drafts combined here?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Aynf224/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:05, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Usman Arshad (July 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Usman Arshad and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:32, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DoubleGrazing,

I am on it.

Thanks for the guidance. Aynf224 (talk) 04:51, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Usman Arshad

Hello, Aynf224. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Usman Arshad, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:05, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]