User talk:Aymara93

October 2018

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Beeblebrox (talk) 05:01, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I didn’t block User:Monorodo because they seemed to stop their foolishness, but it seems pretty clear this is the same person doing the same thing. Beeblebrox (talk) 05:02, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

please unblock me

hello @user:Beeblebrox please unblock me. I ONLY ASK MY QUESTION IN AUTOWIKIPEDIABRROWSER (about create and edit Mass move article to new page (redirect) [by regex in awb]) AND YOU BLOCK ME. MY BOT azb:ایشلدن:4321bot CREATE MANY ARTICLE IN AZB WIKIPEDIA

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aymara93 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I ONLY ASK MY QUESTION IN AUTOWIKIPEDIABRROWSER (about create and edit Mass move article to new page (redirect) [by regex in awb]) AND YOU BLOCK ME. MY BOT azb:ایشلدن:4321bot CREATE MANY ARTICLE IN AZB WIKIPEDIA

Decline reason:

You have not addressed your violations of WP:SOCK. Yamla (talk) 18:51, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

dearYamla please look at user:monorodo add wikitable or infobox --Aymara93 (talk) 21:16, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--Aymara93 (talk) 18:22, 21 March 2019 (UTC) Mass move article to new page (redirect) [by regex in awb][reply]

The problem, as it has been all along, is that you are not really making any sense and don't seem to be able to communicate clearly. I don't know if this is a language issue or something else, but it makes it difficult to even evaluate what you are saying. It's not at all clear that you even understand why your accounts were blocked. If you are not able to post a coherent unblock request then you probably shouldn't be editing here at all and at some point your ability to use this page may be revoked as well. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:41, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

dear Beeblebrox, english wikipedia belong to all people of world. My english is poor. I need to unblock because i want to ask my questions about advanced editing (regex) by bots. You may kind with me.--Aymara93 (talk) 13:50, 22 March 2019 (UTC) dear Amorymeltzer, GorillaWarfare and Jimbo Wales I block in 13 October 2018. I request unblock me. I ONLY ASK MY TECHNICAL QUESTION IN EN.WIKIPEDIA --Aymara93 (talk) 19:36, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Could you please stop putting comments inside an already declined unblock request? If you want previously uninvolved admins to look into your situation you need to file a new unblock request, and stop making it look like all this discussion went on inside the old one. You'll probably want to read the guide to appealing blocks first. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:23, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aymara93 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry for use two account.I NEVER DO THIS AGAIN. I am edit more than 440,000 edition in azb.wikipedia by 4321bot.I learn in en.wikipedia how to edit by bots. en.wikipedia is amazing and full of Genius of internet science . I ONLY ASK MY TECHNICAL QUESTION IN EN.WIKIPEDIA.--Aymara93 (talk) 09:48, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Putting aside the sockpuppetry issue, I agree that your proficiency in written English is insufficient to contribute constructively here. MER-C 19:42, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aymara93 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I NEED TO UNBLOCK ME.DEAR Beeblebrox I had Punished Aymara93 (talk) 16:36, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your unblock requests are incomprehensible, and I agree that you lack the competence to edit English Wikipedia. I have revoked your talk page access to prevent further time-wasting. You can still use WP:UTRS to request an unblock, but I suggest that you make more of an effort to write coherently. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:06, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

attempt to end-run the above.

See [1] where they pinged myself and another admin to a a completely different project to basically repeat what they said before. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:40, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]