User talk:Ayaelmelegy

Ayaelmelegy, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Ayaelmelegy! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

November 2021

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 00:12, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ayaelmelegy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't know who is Salem Imam and I don't know why I was blocked

Decline reason:

There's definitely been logged-out block evasion here which alone is enough for me to decline this unblock. Yamla (talk) 10:43, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ayaelmelegy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please i don't know who is salem imam. I created this account and it was first time dor me to use Wikipedia and article was deleted. I kept reading and practicing and created another account (poewag) and it got blocked again

Decline reason:

Poewag, Mrjohnaytedvx, and you are all on the same IP address and have edited articles about Gehad Hamdy. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:19, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note to reviewing admin: I used CU to make the connection between this account and the Poewag sock, which this user has acknowledged was them (see also the discussions at the talk page over at that account). The original master, Salem Imam, is stale, so I can make no comment on their assertion that they are unconnected to that master. Certainly, there has been block evasion from this editor, both through new accounts and through IPs; I'll leave it for another admin to consider whether their story about not understanding that they weren't allowed to create new accounts, or edit through IPs, is credible. Girth Summit _(blether) 19:14, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Noway salemimam is me i don't who he is and he can't be even using my ip because I don't give my mobile to anyone. And yes i tried to create the articles and kept practice to follow all the guidelines so why is that wrong? Ayaelmelegy (talk) 19:27, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ayaelmelegy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i really don't know who is salemimam if it was me i would have told you Last discussion: Note to reviewing admin: I used CU to make the connection between this account and the Poewag sock, which this user has acknowledged was them (see also the discussions at the talk page over at that account). The original master, Salem Imam, is stale, so I can make no comment on their assertion that they are unconnected to that master. Certainly, there has been block evasion from this editor, both through new accounts and through IPs; I'll leave it for another admin to consider whether their story about not understanding that they weren't allowed to create new accounts, or edit through IPs, is credible. Girth Summit (blether) 19:14, 7 March 2022 (UTC) Noway salemimam is me i don't who he is and he can't be even using my ip because I don't give my mobile to anyone. And yes i tried to create the articles and kept practice to follow all the guidelines so why is that wrong? Ayaelmelegy (talk) 19:27, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I just blocked another one of your socks. You won't be unblocked while you continue trying to evade your block. I'm sure the cause your organisation is involved in is laudable, but this project is not a platform for promotion, and your repeatedly creating new accounts to promote it is disruptive. If you ever want to edit here, you need to stop creating new accounts, take time to read WP:COI thoroughly, and then in six months request an unblock and commit to abide by that guidance and to stick to a single account. Girth Summit _(blether) 18:20, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ayaelmelegy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

am I never allowed to create another account?

Decline reason:

One open unblock request at a time, please. And no, most definitely not. WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE. Yamla (talk) 23:05, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I didn't know Ayaelmelegy (talk) 23:07, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are blocked, whatever account you use. Please address the reasons for your block instead of continuing to evade your block. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:04, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #58097

is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:00, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Salem Imam --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:02, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]