User talk:Awesimus

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Awesimus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am editing from a school IP address. I request IP block exemption. The vandalism is not my problem. Awesimus (talk) 17:37, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This request is the only edit from this account, and it was made within minutes of its creation. If you truly wish to contribute productively and get an IP block exemption, find another place to edit from outside the block and make productive edits. — Daniel Case (talk) 20:44, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

April 2014

Hello, I'm Geraldo Perez. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Disney XD (Australia) without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:25, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pavle Đurišić. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Pavle Đurišić was changed by Awesimus (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.874565 on 2014-04-13T16:37:48+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:37, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gaza Strip, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Gaza Strip was changed by Awesimus (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.894289 on 2014-04-13T16:38:52+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:39, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at List of Sam & Cat episodes, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: List of Sam & Cat episodes was changed by Awesimus (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.934385 on 2014-04-13T16:40:10+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:40, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. G S Palmer (talk) 16:41, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Awesimus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Template:Second chance. Removed channel listings. As per WP:NOTDIRECTORY, WP:NOTTVGUIDE, and various afds. Awesimus (talk)

Decline reason:

Second chance would actually apply if this perhaps was your first block or your only account, but it's not. You've definitely tried to evade your block by trying to create more accounts in deceptive manners. There's quite a number of other problems and looking at your history, I find that you do not have understanding of what you did wrong. Elockid ^(Talk) 22:04, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.