User talk:AvonKerr

Do not copy plot summaries from external websites

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. MER-C 12:04, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AvonKerr, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi AvonKerr! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Osarius (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Creating disambiguations

Please confirm that no other article exists that is specifically related to a main topic. From Venus with Love (The Avengers) is the same as From Venus with Love, which is the only article titled as such and was created years ago in relation to the TV series. Thank you. — Wylie pedia 11:56, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Clive Colin-Bowler

Hello AvonKerr,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Clive Colin-Bowler for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 16:06, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

TV articles

Hi, thanks for your work. Please note my changes (like this) to your recent article creations. It's worth pointing this out because you seem to be creating a lot of them. It would save us a lot of time if you went easy on the linking. Tony (talk) 12:54, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Forrest (actor)

Thanks for this. Any chance you could add some citations to reliable sources like books or news articles? Blythwood (talk) 11:24, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kenneth Keeling

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kenneth Keeling requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:48, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ian Gardiner (actor) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ian Gardiner (actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ian Gardiner (actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 12:17, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Roy Patrick (actor)

Hello, AvonKerr,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Roy Patrick (actor) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roy Patrick (actor) .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

TheLongTone (talk) 16:03, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A. J. Brown

Hi AvonKerr,

I've just looked at A. J. Brown, and he may not meet standards for notability (it looks like he was a minor character actor). You've added a number of similar pages which have also been tagged and/or nominated for deletion. When this happens, it's an unfortunate waste of everyone's time and energy, especially yours.

Unless it can be demonstrated that actors meet one more notability standards, in particular WP:GNG/WP:ANYBIO, or WP:NACTOR, such articles are likely to be deleted. Merely being in a lot of films or TV episodes in minor roles is not sufficient (and IMDB is a questionable source - see Wikipedia:Citing IMDb). What's needed is evidence that the actor is actually notable; this can be demonstrated by citing secondary sources. In the case of actors, secondary sources might include reviews and critical coverage of significant performances. If someone can't be immediately established as notable but you still want to start an article, you can keep an article as a Draft or Userspace draft while you search for WP:Reliable sources. Good luck, ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 08:52, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about David Grey (actor)

Hello, AvonKerr,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether David Grey (actor) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Grey (actor) .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:59, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kenneth Keeling

The article Kenneth Keeling has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable actor, only minor parts. No evidence of sources that indicate potential for improvement.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 11:00, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]