User talk:Avisonika

October 2024

Hello, I'm Paper9oll. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Microsoft Copilot have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 03:00, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Avisonika, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Best practices for editors with close associations
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style
The Teahouse, our help forum for new editors

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, visit the Teahouse, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! AntiDionysius (talk) 22:23, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Avisonika/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Avisonika/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AntiDionysius (talk) 22:23, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Digitally Available

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Digitally Available, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ForsythiaJo (talk) 22:49, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Digitally Available (November 3)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by I dream of horses was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Is an ad.

I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 22:50, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Avisonika! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 22:50, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Acroterion (talk) 22:53, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:01, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Avisonika (talk) 01:04, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Avisonika (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Im Requesting the Unblock because the edit i made was very muchrelated to the contentand if you want you can check the contenton that particularwebsite. I just added a link because i found this useful

Decline reason:

The only thing you have ever done on Wikipedia in a month of editing was to try to add spam links and promotional material regarding DigitallyAvailable.com to this encyclopedia.Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:52, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Subject: Request for Review and Unblocking of My Account

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Avisonika (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia Editors,

I hope this message finds you well. I recently discovered that my account has been blocked for adding links to my website. I want to sincerely apologize if my actions were interpreted as spamming. I was not aware that adding multiple related or informational links within a short timeframe could lead to my account being marked as spam.

My intention was solely to contribute valuable and relevant content to Wikipedia. The links I added were directly related to the topics and aimed to enhance the informational quality of the articles, not to promote my website. I now understand that adding too many links, even when relevant, can be considered problematic.

I want to assure you that I am a real individual, not a bot or spammer, and I deeply respect Wikipedia's mission of providing free and reliable knowledge. If given the opportunity, I will adhere strictly to Wikipedia’s guidelines moving forward and limit my contributions to ensure compliance with the platform’s standards.

I kindly request that my account be reviewed and unblocked. I am open to any further guidance on how I can make meaningful and compliant contributions to Wikipedia.

Thank you for your time and understanding.

Best regards.

Decline reason:

We want to hear from you, not your chatbot. -- asilvering (talk) 20:19, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Avisonika (talk) 20:00, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't stop including nowiki tags in your appeals they will not display, and I'm not going to continue fixing them for you. Also note that appeals written by Chatbots, as this newest one obviously is, will be declined.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:03, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Use the edit button at the top instead of the reply button. The reply button makes a mess of things. Also use the text editor instead of the visual editor. The visual editor also messes everything up. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:52, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]