User talk:Avicenno/أرشيف 1

Anytime in my talk page you can talk with me about any thing.

Links to Arabic-wikipedia articles

You are receiving this as you have recently added an interwiki link to a page!

Wikidata has been deployed to the English Wikipedia. Wikidata manages interwiki links on a separate project on pages such as this. This means that on Wikipedia articles there is now a language bar on the left hand side of your screen where you can edit and add links rather than adding them into the articles themselves.

If you have any questions regarding Wikidata please use the talk page Wikipedia talk:Wikidata.

DMacks (talk) 17:03, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Deletion nominations

Please do not tag pages for speedy deletion unless they meet the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you, —Kusma (t·c) 12:24, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

These numbers' pages are currently merged together at 240 (number). We do not seem to have enough interesting information about these numbers to justify having separate articles. —Kusma (t·c) 14:23, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Bata-aminoisobutyrate

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Bata-aminoisobutyrate. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – 3-Aminoisobutyric acid. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at 3-Aminoisobutyric acid – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Dengero (talk) 14:30, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Xanthosine triphosphate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ITP. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:56, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Sorry

I didn't mean to be offensive about non-native speakers generally. My point to the other editgor was that one should make an effort to at least get simple sentences basically correct. It is no easy matter to write in a foreign language, and generally the effort to do so is deeply appreciated, especially in difficult areas of Wikipedia where local (non-'Western')input is lacking. By the way, I will be shortly, in a day or two, adding a major rewrite of an article here, which uses extensively transcriptions from Arabic, and would appreciate your assistance in reviewing these parts so that the accents, long and short vowels, are regularly transcribed throughout. Best wishes. Nishidani (talk) 09:26, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Palestinian stone-throwing. Don't worry about the article, which is long and perhaps tiresome. If possible just examine it to see that the Arabic transcriptions are correct and internally consistent. Thanks. Nishidani (talk) 15:57, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Nishidani thank you for your notification. I translated the latest article you mentioned to arabic. Unfortiunatly contributions of arabs as whole and palastinians specially, even in arabic wikipedia and other arabic wiki projects are very little due to many reasons such as lack of mony to pay for internet connections and because of they have restrictios from some governments that take their countries from them and through them out of their countries and homes. So even me i dont have any internet connection because it require additional money which i dont have it So my contributions here is due to that my mobile phone company offers free surffing to wikipedia and its other projects and without this free surffing you connot see me here or talk with me because i dont have any internet connection and dont have many knowledge about internet exept about wikis which i surf it freely without any charge or paying. So my time is little. I want to help you in reviewing the article but i dont have enogh time because i study one of the most difficlt subjects and studies in the world, Medicine. I am realy happy for yor messeges and i want to keep with contact with you continuosly for ever after and to be a frinends. Best wishes and full regard brother--1339861mzb (talk) 20:28, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Sorry to hear that you have those problems (it is little consolation to know that lack of means and hard necessity are often the mothers of creativity, inventiveness and virtue: comfortable people are, in my experience, complacently stupid, or stupefied by their assumptions the world they live in is in the nature of things, and not a freak of peculiar historical circumstances). Still, you have chosen the noblest profession of all, medicine, and Palestinian doctors have a certain repute in the world: they must handle a workload that few of their Western peers can imagine. If I may proffer some advice, don't consider difficulties in net access a setback: I am puzzled by the readiness of young people to get sucked into the whirlpools of indiscriminate distraction offered by Iphones etc. I refuse to adopt these technologies because I am jealous of my private time, and want to be detached from the huge volume of "noise" that passes for information. I wish you the very best in your studies, and for life, at present and the future. When I am in Palestine, I find the best thing is to quietly sit in an olive grove or enclosed garden, and listen, far from phones, television, computers, to the birds, or the rustle of leaves, or the play of light on the hillsides, or some friendly conversation. The resonance of history is so thick there, that the modern world seems to be like a hectic swarm of locusts, gluttonous to devour the countryside, or shit garbage or concrete all over a landscape otherwise ineffably beautiful for its "kingly" (meleke) stone construction (contrast Rawabi). Best wishes Nishidani (talk) 10:24, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did to You Can't Imagine How Much Fun We're Having, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 122.29.47.243 (talk) 20:14, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to You Can't Imagine How Much Fun We're Having. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 122.17.201.22 (talk) 21:10, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Trench fever, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Galicia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Macrophage

"Macrophages contain some amount of iron reaches 500 mg" really does not make any sense. A Macrophage cannot contain 500mg of iron because they are only about 21 microns in diameter so their total mass is far less than 500 mg. If you include a link that can be followed then maybe someone can clarify what you are trying to say and why it is significant. Mtpaley (talk) 21:38, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

OK maybe all the macrophages in the body contain a total of 500 mg of Iron but is this actually significant? Why put this in the article? Mtpaley (talk) 19:17, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dystrophy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tissue. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Warning

Your recent editing history at History of Jordanian wine shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.. Your refusal to accept basic speedy deletion policy increases the likelihood that you will lose your editing privileges if you restore the speedy tag again. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 18:39, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Bad Dryer (talk) 18:41, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Edit warring at History of Jordanian wine

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 04:09, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Avicenno (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

what happen was misunderstanding. And the creator who remove the template 2 times and break speedy deletion policy is not blocked! مصعب (talk) 05:51, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Multiple people told you that your speedy nomination wasn't appropriate, the result was a classic "one vs. many" where you have gone over the blockable limit of reverts while others didn't. Please understand that while your block says "edit warrning", you might as well have been blocked for disruptive editing because your nominations were clearly inappropriate. Please wait out your block and don't mess with that article in the future. Max Semenik (talk) 10:53, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Avicenno (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Anotger time i am a new user althght i am here from 2 years but iam not involved with real editing but just simple edits. see google translate editor is translated "محرر" and in arabic wiki there is a flag for editors see here. So that thind make me misunderstand policy and after i realized my fault i saied sorry here and after that i dont remove the templatem. While the creator who realize the policy of wp:speedy that state crealy that creator mustnt remove deletion template and the creator remove not once but twice and my reverting of his edits is not a break of 3RR policy because its a clear vandalism for creator to remove the template and noone even warn him for his braking the policy and he wasnt banned because of this break to policy. It is not fair to ban who misunderstood and dont ban who break the policy clearly or even warn him. Those users who remove the template dont assume agood faith and from first edit thay consider my edits vandalism. Wkipedia is free encyclopedia where no one force users to not edit certain article in future as the admin said a bove. Admin should advice banned user not to edit the article which was disagreement about it in the near future. The admins dosent give advise but an order not edit article in future at all! .regards مصعب (talk) 11:59, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I don't see any acceptance that you were the disruptive editor in this case. You reverted two different editors a total of three times [1][2][3] before the article creator removed the CSD tag[4]. You reverted the removal of the speedy deletion tag a total of eight times. in one of your reverts you told an editor "speedy deletion policy indicate that any editor can remove the template but not any user or any IP. You are not editor. Dont force your opinion." The person who removed it is an editor and they had every right to remove it. You were trying to force your opinion on the article by your disruptive reverts. You should use the rest of your time away from editing to read the policies of this Wikipedia. -- GB fan 00:30, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@GB fan: Tow of my reverts was reverting of the creator removing that you or any admin here doent answer me why dont you dont warn the creator or ban him for his break of the policy. That is a double-faced dealing with users. I told you that i based on term "editor" as a type of flags as in arabic wiki "محرر" not any user and i dont read your policies beacause i was thinking that basic guidlines and policies are unified. You dont assume agood faith and that is bad to be from admin. Even the user who report me said that it may indeed a misunderstanding and that is the truth. Can you provide a policy said i must stop from editing until i read all policies. Thats wrong. If what you say is true then why that users who dosent have any permession or flag or even Ip can edit? Because it is a free encyclopedia according to Wikipedia:Five pillars. Toz---مصعب (talk) 08:25, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Yes, two of your reverts were reverting the article creators removal of a CSD tag that should not have been there in the first place. It was an invalid tag that should have never been added as it does not conform to any of the valid speedy deletion criterion. That though is a mistake I can AGF about. You want us to believe that you were acting under good faith and this is all a misunderstanding because of a way that a different Wikipedia works. I have a real problem assuming good faith about the three reverts you made after you were warned about violating the three revert rule along with a notice you had been reported at a admin notice board for your edit warring. I also have a problem assuming good faith after you were told "Anyone except the article creator can decline a speedy. Read WP:SPEEDY carefully. Do not restore again!" you restored the tag six times. Why didn't you assume good faith and read the policy? I never said you should stop editing until you read all policies, I said you should use the rest of your blocked time to read policies. If you didn't read any policies while you were blocked you able able to edit now that your block has expired. -- GB fan 12:21, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

@GB fan: not assuming agood faith is your problem. If user who report me belive in that so thats enough to prove that your decision is completely wrong. In our wiki no one can remove the templete exept admin and who have editor flag "محرر" that seems to be dont present here so i behave according to our policy before i read what do your wiki define editor as so what i do was correct according to my understanding of the policy which i think it is unified. Seem to be you turn around my question and dont aswer it. Why dont you or other admins dont ban or either warn the creator who remove the template that policy state clearly not to remove it by the creator under any reason or situation (even if it is compleatly wrong as you say)? Thats is double faced dealing with users and seem to be that here there is sympathizing wirh native speacher at the expence of non-native speachers and that is very hateful behavour althogh i provide what make me understand the policy wrongly either from google translate or from to pages in arabic wiki one for editor as aflag "محرر" and the other for wp:editor which wasnt created at ar wiki and i creat it at the day of prolem after i read your policy. ---مصعب (talk) 17:13, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

My decision to decline your unblock request had absolutely nothing to do with the language anyone speaks. This had only to do with your refusal to accept that you did anything wrong and your seemingly refusal to read the policies that were presented to you or to even go to somewhere to ask a question if what was happening is correct. Instead of doing those things you assumed that the other editor's actions were wrong and you were right. If you had stopped and asked or read the policies you would have found out that you were wrong and they were right and that would have been the end of it. Another reason to decline your unblock request is that your request focused on other's actions rather than focusing on what you did wrong and how you will correct it. I don't fault the original creator for removing the speedy deletion tag in this instance because it had been removed by two other editors and you were readding it against policy. There are times to ignore all rules and this is one of them. I am sorry you don't understand that but at this point I am going to disengage. -- GB fan 20:17, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

FWIW, as the editor who reported this user, I believe this may indeed have been a misunderstanding of policy by a new, non native English speaking user, and I would be ok with shortening his block to 'time served'. Bad Dryer (talk) 16:38, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

@EdJohnston: please look here---مصعب (talk) 18:23, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

I will not be the person to lift the block. It is not convincing to see so many reverts excused as a 'misunderstanding.' The combination of aggressive and uninformed can be risky. If you really don't know our system yet, why not work on less controversial things until you have experience? EdJohnston (talk) 18:28, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

@EdJohnston: because wipiedia is a free encyclopedia and you cant force my to edit certain articles until i get experinced. I have free will in free encyclopedia. Yor speech is counter the policies. Why don't wikipedia sytstem prevent users who hasnt any flag or any permession from editing until become experinced?. Very strange request from admin! Why dosent you warn or ban the creator for his breackage of the policy? Can you answer me?. If users dosent make mistakes the will not learn. I learn new information from this problem. But first thing that i notice here in english wiki is the abcense of asuming good faith and no following of Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers. Regards---مصعب (talk) 21:02, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

The term 'free encyclopedia' could be misleading. We expect people to use common sense here. If not, they can be blocked. Technical mistakes can be forgiven, but good conduct is up to you. The person's attitude can be perceived even when there is a language barrier. EdJohnston (talk) 21:17, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fatigue. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:29, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Neonatology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chronic lung disease. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

WP:ANI

I asked admins at WP:ANI to undo your unilateral move of Category:Palestinian terrorism for the reasons I mentioned there. Nothing personal. Please feel free to comment there. Debresser (talk) 23:13, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Terrorism exists, and is distinct from political violence

... such as in the case of the Dolphinarium discotheque massacre. The simplest definition of terrorism, indiscriminate murder of civilians not directly involved in a conflict, applies there 100%. If you are training to become a doctor, one of the most moral-based professions with a study concluded by an ethical oath, you should know what the difference is between, say, stone-throwing against military vehicles and even settlers, or armed fight against the Israeli occupation force, and blowing up minors at a discotheque. If you want to be taken serious as a human being by anyone, please pause, think it through, and draw your conclusions. "Kill them before they grow up and can kill you/fight back" is beyond inhumane.Arminden (talk) 01:30, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

October 2016

As per WP:TPO editors are allowed to remove anything on their talkpage and editors reverting you isn't edit warring, I've removed your AN3 report as it's not edit warring at all, I would advise you to read wp:edit warring before making any more reports like that,
(BTW your report wasn't even correctly formatted so again if you want to report anyone you should read how to do it before filing it),
Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 15:44, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

@Davey2010: thank you. I am just not good at english so i dont know where to but it. Regards--مصعب (talk) 16:18, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, مصعب. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

2017 attack in Turkey

The Young lady is listed as an Israeli in the list, we do not list the same person twice. So if you have a source that says she is a Palestinian please explain on the talk page why this should take precedence of her being an Israeli please.Slatersteven (talk) 22:40, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

@Slatersteven: I am sorry. I was just want to correct the total number of injured people because it was in correct becaus there was 2 injured palestinian who are not added to the list. Regards--مصعب (talk) 22:44, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Yes they are.22:45, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

discuss at the talkpage. you are at WP:3RR ! 80.132.91.197 (talk) 22:47, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Which I have already suggested.Slatersteven (talk) 22:49, 1 January 2017 (UTC)