User talk:Aviator Jr
Hello, Aviator Jr, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking 
or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! - wolf 09:43, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- Introduction
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
- Introduction to navigating Wikipedia
- Using the Search engine
- Table of contents
- Directories and indexes
- Department directory
- Frequently asked questions
- Cheatsheet
- Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
- The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
- Help pages
- Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
January 2024
[edit]
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.
Regarding your recent edits to Air India fleet, it has been clearly mentioned earlier that details of wet-leased aircraft should not be included as per WP:ALFC. You have again made the same edits and please stop making such disruptive edits. Regarding the other edits, simplyflying is not a WP:RS; if you have an official source for the Boeing orders, it can be incorporated. Same goes for special livery cases, need reliable sources.Magentic Manifestations (talk) 02:51, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Magentic Manifestations I have now understood the problem about wet leased aircraft. But I have found and given enough references about B737 Max orders and the transfer of 50 of them to Air India Express and I have re-edited the page for this. In addition I also have given the special livery aircrafts. Hope this is okay now! Aviator Jr (talk) 09:56, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hi! Please check the alignment of text and ensure the same when you are adding it. Another point, please do not add Simpleflying as a source as per WP:RS and ensure that other notable sources are there. Have made the changes for now. Thanks! Magentic Manifestations (talk) 10:19, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the edit @Magentic Manifestations
- Aviator Jr (talk) 11:49, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hi! Please check the alignment of text and ensure the same when you are adding it. Another point, please do not add Simpleflying as a source as per WP:RS and ensure that other notable sources are there. Have made the changes for now. Thanks! Magentic Manifestations (talk) 10:19, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia and copyright
[edit]
Hello Aviator Jr! Your additions to Indian Ballistic Missile Defence Programme have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 16:09, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot for informing... I will take care from now Aviator Jr (talk) 17:45, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
March 2024
[edit] Hello, I'm Echo1Charlie. I noticed that you recently removed content from HAL AMCA without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Happy editing:) Echo1Charlie (talk) 18:47, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
Editing conduct on Project-75 (India) submarine acquisition project
[edit]Hello User:Aviator Jr
I've noticed you've made a slew of edits to the Wiki article concerning India's Project-75 (India) submarine acquisition project; however, it has been noted some of your edits have not included specific reasons as to such. An instance, for example, would be your edit to put most of the sub-topics entirely under the History chapter, namely,
- Planning
- Progress (and its associated timeline)
- Strategic partnership policy
- Post-2020 developments
Do note, this article is for the convenience of the reader, and partitioning the content into multiple relevant chapters aids in reading convenience. Do not commit edits merely because its suits your taste.
Another, the Contestants chapter should come immediately after the History chapter, as the former is a 2020 event, which connect the pre-2020 planning and the post-2020 delays and revival. Please do no change that also.
Yours sincerely.
Silver Pavilion (talk) 04:08, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- My edits are not merely because it "suits my taste". Why not keep the entire timeline of events under Progress section with decade wise sub-sections? 2021-2024 sections is afterall Progress of the programme only. Also, now that the programme has suddenly gained momentum and there are lots of recent development the Shortlisting section should become Contestants as this no more remains just the development of 2020 and is being updated regularly. Also, History section you may kept as separate section. Thanks, Aviator Jr (talk) 08:24, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Kolkata Mounted Police
[edit]I trust that you have no objections but I have just transferred your recent well-written and sourced contribution on the above subject from the "Cavalry" article to the "Mounted Police" article. There are no significant changes in the wording and it now provides a new India section. Regards Buistr (talk) 09:06, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for that, I did not know about this page. Aviator Jr (talk) 11:06, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Your edits on pages relating to the Indian military
[edit]Hello. Please stop adding dubious/fantasy material about the Indian military, sourced to "defence.in", it's a private/personal website/blog hosted by GoDaddy.com, with striking similarities to a previous website in India that has been blacklisted here, and NOT a reliable source by Wikipedia's rules. The page about the "Project 18 destroyer" that you created is also a recreation of a page that has been deleted twice at AfD for being a proven hoax, based on a fantasy navy thread on Reddit. If you continue adding dubious material sourced to very dubious websites you will be reported to WP:Ani, seeking administrator action against you. Drachentöter001 | talk 12:43, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- The entire page on Project 18 class destroyer is not dependant on one source. Are you sure that they are all "fantasy"-based reports? These information are based on official press releases and posts. Aviator Jr (talk) 16:06, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- No, they're not, they're speculations about what a new destroyer might be like, the only thing that is known, and properly sourced, is that the Indian Navy wants to build a number of new large destroyers, everything else is pure speculation, and even the name, "Project 18-class destroyer", is pure speculation, based on the fantasy navy thread on Reddit, so when I have time for it I intend to nominate your new fantasy article for deletion. Drachentöter001 | talk 16:35, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- The development of new generation destroyers was officially revealed by the Vice Chief of Indian Navy. The other specifications of 144 VLS configuration could be seen in a video posted by one of Navy's official twitter handle. Project 18 is nothing Reddit special the same term has also been used on the USNI News article I have referred to on the page. Please have a look at it and read them properly. In fact, the page has also been reviewed and no change had to be made. Aviator Jr (talk) 17:10, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- USNI say "A new next-generation destroyer, sometimes dubbed Project 18", meaning that some people sometimes call it "Project 18", but Wikipedia does not go by what some people sometimes say, we go by what reliable sources say the name of the project is, and the only ones who can definitely say what the project is called, if even there is a specific project, is the Indian Navy, through their official websites. So no, we can NOT have an article named "Project 18 destroyer". And regardless what the article title is we can't have an article where the only thing that is properly sourced is that the Indian Navy wants to build a number of large destroyers, with everything else in the article nothing but speculations, Drachentöter001 | talk 21:04, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Well then, at least this is proven that Indian Navy does have a new programme for designing, developing and procuring a class of 10,000 tonne Next Generation Destroyers so you want to say that changing the name to Next Generation Destroyers will solve your problem? No one else has yet disclosed any problem with the page. The VLS configuration is very much prominent in the video released by the official Twitter handle of the Navy. Some time or the other new details will be released about the new project and will be useful in future. In fact, the US Navy is also looking for its DD(X) class of destroyers in future which is still on drawing boards on the page exists with whatever information that is available. Aviator Jr (talk) 05:58, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- No, it won't, since all of the specifications and details in the article are totally made up, based on the fantasy thread on Reddit... Drachentöter001 | talk 07:48, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Where do you find any fantasy or Reddit references in the article? Neither did I look for any Reddit content related to this nor found any nor am I a member of it. The Next Generation Destroyer is a fact and will eventually be the successor of Visakhapatnam class destroyers of the Navy. The article is based on any "thread on Reddit". Your fantasy about the article is not justified. Where do you think the image of the infobox arrives from? I repeat it is from an official video release of the Indian Navy! The video does reveal the weapons configuration idea of the future ship. Any kind of new design evolves from its concept stage. Then how do you justify the page based on US Navy DDG(X) programme. Aviator Jr (talk) 08:01, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- You seriously need to learn how to read sources... Drachentöter001 | talk 08:47, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Where do you find any fantasy or Reddit references in the article? Neither did I look for any Reddit content related to this nor found any nor am I a member of it. The Next Generation Destroyer is a fact and will eventually be the successor of Visakhapatnam class destroyers of the Navy. The article is based on any "thread on Reddit". Your fantasy about the article is not justified. Where do you think the image of the infobox arrives from? I repeat it is from an official video release of the Indian Navy! The video does reveal the weapons configuration idea of the future ship. Any kind of new design evolves from its concept stage. Then how do you justify the page based on US Navy DDG(X) programme. Aviator Jr (talk) 08:01, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- No, it won't, since all of the specifications and details in the article are totally made up, based on the fantasy thread on Reddit... Drachentöter001 | talk 07:48, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Well then, at least this is proven that Indian Navy does have a new programme for designing, developing and procuring a class of 10,000 tonne Next Generation Destroyers so you want to say that changing the name to Next Generation Destroyers will solve your problem? No one else has yet disclosed any problem with the page. The VLS configuration is very much prominent in the video released by the official Twitter handle of the Navy. Some time or the other new details will be released about the new project and will be useful in future. In fact, the US Navy is also looking for its DD(X) class of destroyers in future which is still on drawing boards on the page exists with whatever information that is available. Aviator Jr (talk) 05:58, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- USNI say "A new next-generation destroyer, sometimes dubbed Project 18", meaning that some people sometimes call it "Project 18", but Wikipedia does not go by what some people sometimes say, we go by what reliable sources say the name of the project is, and the only ones who can definitely say what the project is called, if even there is a specific project, is the Indian Navy, through their official websites. So no, we can NOT have an article named "Project 18 destroyer". And regardless what the article title is we can't have an article where the only thing that is properly sourced is that the Indian Navy wants to build a number of large destroyers, with everything else in the article nothing but speculations, Drachentöter001 | talk 21:04, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- The development of new generation destroyers was officially revealed by the Vice Chief of Indian Navy. The other specifications of 144 VLS configuration could be seen in a video posted by one of Navy's official twitter handle. Project 18 is nothing Reddit special the same term has also been used on the USNI News article I have referred to on the page. Please have a look at it and read them properly. In fact, the page has also been reviewed and no change had to be made. Aviator Jr (talk) 17:10, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- No, they're not, they're speculations about what a new destroyer might be like, the only thing that is known, and properly sourced, is that the Indian Navy wants to build a number of new large destroyers, everything else is pure speculation, and even the name, "Project 18-class destroyer", is pure speculation, based on the fantasy navy thread on Reddit, so when I have time for it I intend to nominate your new fantasy article for deletion. Drachentöter001 | talk 16:35, 21 September 2024 (UTC)