User talk:Avantian

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Avantian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This current version of page "berberine" has been radically shortened comparing to what it was two years ago, supposedly in the name of reliability. Although SOME claims of the older versions were not solidly doccumented, most of them were. For example, version of October 10, 2015 had 109 references, mostly in reputable journals and books. The present version has only 13 references. Much damage has been done. Just one example, out of tens alike: Reference #18 of the Oct.10, 2015 "The anti-inflammatory potential of berberine in vitro and in vivo. Kuo CL, Chi CW, Liu TY (January 2004) Cancer Lett. 203 (2): 127–137. doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2003.09.002. PMID 14732220." - why did someone remove this reliable and very important information? And tens of other referenced information? Some people intentionally have been depriving the general population of the right to know those very important medical information. Therefore I reverted it back to what it was before the page was vandalized.

Decline reason:

None of this is relevant to your block. You need to address the reason for your block. WP:GAB explains more. Yamla (talk) 15:54, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.