User talk:Autumn.cunningham
| This user is a student editor in University_of_Central_Missouri/Contemporary_Art_and_Design_(Spring_2019) . |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Autumn.cunningham, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:12, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Article evaluation
[edit]https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Conservation_movement
Everything in the article is relevant to the article topic. Nothing in the reading had distracted me because of its irrelevancy. There is some information that is out of date; but, only because past history is discussed. After reading though the article, I cannot think of any additional information that could be added. Perhaps what could be improved, is the "Green sea turtle conservation" effort. This area seems more specific than the other active efforts. The article speaks about more than one area of concern for wildlife; therefore, I believe that discussing something as specific as sea turtles, is not crucial.
The article is neutral. There seems to be no claims that appear to be biased. I only read facts and statistics concerning countries. "Conservation in the United States", I find, has much more information involved than any other heading. I am not sure why this is.
After checking with many citations, I have found that they are real. Each fact, or claim, does include a reliable reference. These sources do not appear to be biased towards one party over another.
When representing this environmental topic, I find that the order of how to share information, is crucial. I also notice that there is a question raised in removing anti-political goals, areas needing more editing, reverting edits, and much more. The article is rated C-Class on the project's quality scale. It has not had a rating on its importance scale. The article is part of the "WikiProject Environment". We have not discussed this topic specifically in this class beforehand.
One last question I do have is why were more country's conservation movements not discussed?
Autumn Cunningham Autumn.cunningham (talk) 00:32, 11 February 2019 (UTC)