User talk:AustralianPope

AustralianPope, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi AustralianPope! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ushau97 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:40, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sega may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

2001|accessdate=September 20, 2009}}</ref> However, arcade development would continue unaffected.[[Citation needed}} Sega, along with their many software studios, are known for multi-million-selling game franchises
America.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.vidgame.net/SEGA/DC.html|title=Vidgame.net: Sega Dreamcast (archive.org|accessdate=February 23, 2011|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20080213224518/http:/

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:18, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, AustralianPope, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --David Biddulph (talk) 08:49, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

One specific bit of advice is to read Help:Minor edit, as I think that some of the edits which you have marked as minor probably aren't. --David Biddulph (talk) 08:59, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, AustralianPope. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 08:58, 10 March 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Reference Errors on 10 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Nuon (DVD technology) page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:38, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

For your attention.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 21:41, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, AustralianPope. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by PrimeHunter (talk) 00:52, 12 March 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, AustralianPope. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Flat Out let's discuss it 22:48, 12 March 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nuon (DVD technology), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bedazzled (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mach Speed Technologies for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mach Speed Technologies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mach Speed Technologies until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:15, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Craig Electronics

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Craig Electronics, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Jackmcbarn (talk) 00:07, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well

My first article was deleted....:( But it's the same as Coby Electronics so maybe I can point that out to the deleting user. AustralianPope (talk) 16:03, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Hi, thanks for message. I deleted your article because

it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Although you gave references, two were to the company itself, one was a site that can be edited by the company, one was just pure spam, a sales page for your products. None were genuine high-quality independent sources. I also couldn't see any information that would confirm that the company met the notability criteria above.
it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: at affordable prices... popular retailer... Also, the "Company profile" is nothing of the sort in any meaningful sense, it's just more spam at the cutting edge of industry trends... company philosophy that focuses on quality and customer service above all else, we work with companies that span the globe... offering them the latest consumer electronics available.
Apart from the spammy introduction and spammy company profile, all the rest is a spammy list of products. You don't see fit to give any information about the company itself. How many employees? Turnover? Profits? Has the company ever received negative publicity? Who are its competitors?
You have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your organisation is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Wikipedia:Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Wikipedia:Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:29, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies if I incorrectly assumed that you worked for or represented the company. The rest of my comments stand. The fact that there are other articles doesn't help you, either they meet our requirements or they should be deleted too. Anyway, i see that you have been blocked, which suggests that your activities may not have been entirely above board, COI or not Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:14, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Craiglogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Craiglogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:41, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Machspeedlogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Machspeedlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:41, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]