User talk:Aussieboy373

Welcome!

Hello, Aussieboy373, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Baristarim 03:07, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 19:45, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you.Canterbury Tail talk 20:42, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Guy_Stone.png

Thanks for uploading File:Guy_Stone.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:38, 20 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 12:38, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Guy Stone, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Guy Stone was changed by Aussieboy373 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2010-07-25T16:37:02+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:37, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. (X! · talk) · @742 · 16:48, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Guy Stone, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 17:01, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Guy stone

You can delete a page that you create, only if no other editor contributes to it. In this case, several other editors have worked on it and you may not delete it. Please stop trying to remove that article as it is considered disruptive. Toddst1 (talk) 17:01, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Guy Stone, you may be blocked from editing. Ian.thomson (talk) 19:20, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:18, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Sole editor"

Look at the Guy Stone article history. You're not the sole editor. Sole means you're the only editor, and there are multiple editors, which means you're not the sole editor. I'm drunk and I know that that's what "sole" means. "if requested in good faith and provided that the only substantial content to the page and to the associated talk page was added by its author." You aren't the only person to add substantial content. Sorry, you're gonna have to take it to an AfD now. Ian.thomson (talk) 01:04, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MANDIC777. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 01:12, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 2 weeks, for abusing multiple accounts. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. TN X Man 01:44, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aussieboy373 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ok, I find this situation very agitating. I would first like to say that I am not abusing multiple accounts. I created the Guy Stone page under my previous account Mandic777, and I now use aussieboy373, that is all. I was the creator and primary editor of the page. I used the two accounts, and sometimes edited while not signed signed in, which led to my IP address being used. I was under the impression that under G7 of the speedy deletion criteria, I would be allowed to delete this page. Contrary to what Ian Thomson is saying, I am the sole editor of this page. The only other editors were those adding citations and what not. Please allow me to be unblocked, and I would hope you consider watching the user Ian.thomson, who, from my perspective, has harassed me.

Decline reason:

you created the article using your MANDIC777 account early this year, yes. You first used aussieboy373 in early 2008, and have used both of these accounts and your anon IP to edit this article. And while these three editors have contributed the greater part of the article, other editors have made significant contributions, which eliminates G7. Now clearly you do not have to answer this question, or could do so by e-mail if you wish; there is an obvious similarity between one of your usernames and one name used by the subject of the article. Is there a particular reason, which if sent by e-mail I undertake not to reveal, why you want this article to go? If you look at my userpage you will see that my word is good. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 19:32, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.