Jump to content

User talk:Aussie Evil

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Regarding Jigglypuff

[edit]

If you disagree with this article's existence, or the current location of its contents, page blanking is not the appropriate response. You're entirely welcome to discuss your concerns on the article's talk page, and/or the talk page of the article you think it should be moved to/merged with. Your changes have been undone. - Vianello (talk) 19:47, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As I'm currently working on the article to establish notability and improve it to decent quality, I fail to see how "pokemon shouldn't have individual articles" is hardly a valid reason to suggest a merge. If you have something beyond that as reasoning, feel free to bring it up on talk page for the article--Kung Fu Man (talk) 21:05, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Either all Pokémon have articles or they should all be in a list -- NO EXCEPTIONS. I've renom'ed them for mergers. --ÆAUSSIEevilÆ 15:44, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
And what kind of logic is that supposed to be. Show one policy that says such.
Newsflash: only some of them are notably. The rest, indeed, are list material. And some of those on lists should in turn be made back into full articles, but it's really a small pool in that regard.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 17:16, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage temporary deletion

[edit]

Because even though we had reverted the vandalism from User:137.164.143.116, the personal information was still visible in the edit summaries. I deleted the page and restored everything but the edit with the vandal summary. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:04, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

[edit]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock of 137.164.143.116 lifted or expired.

Request handled by: Woody (talk) 21:54, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Calotterylogo.gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:09, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

I thought I would let you know that I have nominated Wikipe-tan for Featured picture at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates#Wikipe-tan. -- Ned Scott 10:20, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage redesign.

[edit]

Are you still looking for your userpage to be redone? If so, take a look at:designbyroux

roux ] [x] 06:41, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Evilness

[edit]

Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmwmmmmmmmmoooooooooooooooooooaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaahhhhhhhhaaaaa!! Count Blofeld 19:40, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:TheBigSpinTitles.png)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:TheBigSpinTitles.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:18, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:GoldenGateTransitLogo.svg)

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GoldenGateTransitLogo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 21:43, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:TheBigSpinTitles.png listed for deletion

[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:TheBigSpinTitles.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sottolacqua (talk) 15:12, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Koman90/templates/now-svg

Orphaned non-free image File:CALottLogo.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CALottLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:08, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

a boy tells jokes to his poop

[edit]

a boy tells jokes to his poop --50.131.74.239 (talk) 20:10, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Xbox 360 Error codes.svg

[edit]

Dear Aussie Evil.

Thank you for taking the trouble for re-creating File:Xbox 360 Error codes.svg . Unfortunately there are a few glaring problems with the picture. First the textbox with the original text "The XBOX 360 video game console has a 'Ring of Light', a circle of 4 bi-color LEDs, with ..... the console is placed horizontally or vertically" has become invisible, although the text still appears in the SVG source code. Also in the "overheated" section the two left segments should be red to indicate they are blinking, as it is they are black as if overheating is indicated by all four quadrants being all unlit. Would you please fix these problems if you can, otherwise it might be necessary to restore the old, more factually correct picture. Mahjongg (talk) 00:57, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It looked all right in Inkscape. I'll revert it. --ÆAUSSIEevilÆ 02:07, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, thats much better, I saw that some of the text was truncated so I tweaked the picture size so now all text is rendered correctly.
I checked the result with Firefox and Safari, and it looks alright now. Thanks for your effort. Mahjongg (talk) 21:01, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could you not do the Bulbagarden-esque division of Physical/Special attackers and instead use the order that has appeared in all of the official Pokémon media, and the order that appears in the original image?—Ryulong (竜龙) 07:46, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you can provide a good reason other than personal preference. --ÆAUSSIEevilÆ 20:07, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It's the form that appears in every Nintendo publication. The order of "Normal, Fire, Water, Grass, Electric..." is also found in reliable sources like the published game guides and other websites. Your ordering is arbitrary and only based on what the fandom believes separates the types from each other, rather than based on actual charts from Nintendo.—Ryulong (竜龙) 20:25, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done. For the sake of consistency, I've asked Bulbawiki to reorder their chart as well. --ÆAUSSIEevilÆ 21:02, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why does the pokemon type chart have 17 different types of attackers, but only 16 types of defenders? Bug pokemon have to defend themselves, too!

Yup, "Bug" is missing from the defender list, and "Rock" and "Ghost" are in opposite order in the two lists. 24.6.168.170 (talk) 09:43, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
So it is. Thanks for pointing it out to me, I'll have it repaired today. --ÆAUSSIEevilÆ 23:57, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

digictjobs

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Aussie Evil. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Aussie Evil. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Aussie Evil. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Aussie Evil. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]