User talk:August Dominus
|
--BlindEagletalk~contribs 16:30, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Zagreb Zoo
[edit]A tag has been placed on Zagreb Zoo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TheIslander 21:02, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Question
[edit]- How I can change user name in August Dominus? Fast answer.
--Jolo Buki Original (talk) 13:08, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
Changing username
[edit]Hello. A bureaucrat or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up as soon as possible. Thank you. –Juliancolton | Talk 14:45, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
[edit]Hello Jolo Buki Original! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 352 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
- Miho Bošković - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:30, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Križevci anchor of tigers
[edit]You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
A tag has been placed on Križevci anchor of tigers, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}}
to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Timbouctou (talk) 17:44, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Edit-warring
[edit]You have been editing-warring on multiple pages recently. Please discuss your proposed changes on the respective talk pages to find a consensus. Blind reverts will not be tolerated. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 22:55, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
- I have blocked you for 24 hours, because you continue to edit-war without any attempt at discussion. Please read WP:Consensus to understand how content disputes are resolved. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 23:14, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
- Block extended since you immediately resumed edit-warring upon the expiry of the last one. You need to engage other editors in talkpage discussions to arrive at consensus, and the reliable sources we already have on those pages do not support your position. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 15:09, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:54, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Serbo-Croatian
[edit]Hi Jolo. What you imagine to be four "different languages", is in fact merely one and the same language in 4 trivially differing variants, and is recognized as such by pretty much the entire world, sans the approval of national language committees of the petty Balkanic banana-countries "governing" them. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 09:17, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
List of languages by number of native speakers
[edit]Please stop reverting List of languages by number of native speakers just to add your view. It is considered disruptive to revert corrections to an article in order to make some point, and may get you WP:blocked. Also, Wikipedia is based on references: if you want to say Croatian is closer to Bulgarian than it is to Serbian, you need WP:reliable sources. — kwami (talk) 23:20, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 7
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lastovo (town), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Romantic and Gothic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 28
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vis (town), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Crown and Correspondence. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, August Dominus. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
A page you started (National Archaeological Museum of the Marche Region) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating National Archaeological Museum of the Marche Region, August Dominus!
Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
I've added a category and tags on the talk page. Some more citations would be nice.
To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Blythwood (talk) 08:59, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, August Dominus. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, August Dominus. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, August Dominus. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
WP:NOTGALLERY, WP:GALLERY and multiple galleries containing only "your" images?
[edit]Hi. I note in recent days that you have placed image galleries to Cork (city), Monkstown, County Cork and other articles. Each containing images exclusively taken by you and uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. You are likely already aware, but per WP:NOTGALLERY, Wikipedia is not intended to be a repository/mirror/outlet for all images already on Commons. And, per WP:GALLERY, images are "typically placed individually near the relevant text"
and, where they are used, a gallery should not be used as "a tool to shoehorn images into an article
" or "an indiscriminate collection of images of the article subject"
. In all frankness, I would suggest that you ask yourself (in all honesty and with self-reflection) why you are placing these "every image I took of this subject" galleries in these articles. And whether, in honesty, they actually improve the readers' understanding of the topic. Or whether, perhaps, you are doing it to provide additional visibility on "your images". All the best. Guliolopez (talk) 10:06, 6 August 2024 (UTC)