User talk:Audrey37

Edit-warring?

Audrey37/Kelsang Jangdom, there's still a discussion going on over the lead. Changing it, and the reverting again to your preferred version, without gaining concensus, is not appreciated here at Wikipedia. Apart from your comments "no consensus for the version you are advocating. Pls stop edit-warring", your comment "try to improve this lead" ignores my contributions, and mirrors your style of editing. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 10:15, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Joshua Jonathan: Nowhere that I've come across on Wikipedia does it specify exactly at what point consenus is arrived at and when it is acceptable to make changes. This is up to each editor. You preferred your suggestion, I and others preferred CFynn's, which is why I added it. No big deal. As I said on the talk page, this is just a starting point for the lead, so of course your contributions can come in. I'm sorry if you felt that I was ignoring your contributions. Perhaps a synthesis of the two suggestions would work well? See what you think. Cheers, Audrey37 (talk) 11:04, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I prefer one stable version; otherwise we'll keep on going back and forth. so, if the majority sticks to this one, I'll leave it this way. Best regards, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 11:14, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to review WP:BRD, WP:CON and WP:EW, they're very educational on edit warring and consensus. Dreadstar ☥ 15:24, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Dreadstar: Thank you Dreadstar - I'll be checking that out! Any advice by the way on the article Western Shugden Society? One editor seems to be very confused about what the article is actually about and is turning it into a page solely about Dorje Shugden with enormous re-writes and no discussion. Very bizarre. Audrey37 (talk) 16:16, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I guess you didn't check out WP:BRD yet. Let me repeat it: when you make a bold edit, and it's being reverted, you discuss it. When you've been informed this two times, and nevertheless you revert back a second time to your preferred version, you're simply ignoring Wiki-policies, and pushing your preferred version. Any person capable of reasonable thinking would understand that there's no concensus on your preferred version. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 21:48, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]