User talk:Atlas Þə Biologist

August 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Cladhexea. Level 4 warning as a continuation of those recieved on your IP talk page. Please familiarize yourself with how to use Help:Talk pages, and how to write an article (see Wikipedia:Writing better articles), before posting this again. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 22:20, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Chaotic Enby! Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 22:24, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chaotic Enby, Wikipedia is made by people who work together. Chaotic Enby can we work together please? Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 22:58, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. UtherSRG (talk) 22:57, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UtherSRG you blocked me? I tried to help Wikipedia by making talk:Cladhexea not destruction. Mines(-) talk:Cladhexea the my edits were like giving an image you know miner stuff. I knew the order Cladhexea wasn’t described yet meaning no info, so I made talk:Cladhexea. Hopefully you understand why I did this just for talk:Cladhexea. Good day. Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 23:09, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. "Not described" doesn't mean that information describing how it looked like/behaved like was missing in the article, it means that the species in the order have not been formally described yet, as the paper establishing most of Placozoa's current taxonomy did not have any type specimens to describe these species from. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 23:14, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In my taxonomy part I only go down to order were the text is bold not linked to anything. Yes info can be misleading like when Cladhexea is described maybe some thing I said are wrong maybe not. I don’t know what Cladhexea is really like so I did any biologist would do, make a good guess. I don’t know maybe cladhexea is extinct maybe maybe not. This is like talking about an extinct animal maybe Protoconodonta an extinct group of arrow worms. We won’t have a lot of data because there extinct. I hope you understand now what is happening. Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 23:27, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And my images are like all placozoa. I can understand why you say that but the images are generall placozoa info, and Cladhexea is a placozoa. Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 23:30, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the argument but all and all I can say that you are right about the images and behavior of Cladhexea but is just a guess based on other placozoa. Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 23:44, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's not "maybe it is extinct maybe not". You can read the article here to see how it is define, it corresponds to former placozoan Clade VI. To be fair, there's really not that much to say about it, but that doesn't mean you can add guesses to the article (see Wikipedia:Original research). Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 00:37, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages are for discussion about the article, not for making drafts for improving it. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 23:46, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have a question DO YOU THINK I CAN MODIFY A ARTICLE TO ITS LIMITS? THINK ABOUT THAT. Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 23:55, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This doesn't make sense. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 00:03, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well the article at least makes sense and if you don’t like my stuff then search the species of placozoa, that will give you some fun(being sarcastic)!. Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 00:16, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

…

Technically, you are correct but still it is pretty good and how did you even find what I made? I mean it has more info than the article so you need to give me some credit and I used reliable sources so and I know there undescribed but they are most likely real. Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 23:53, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I have 2 people arguing with me about making a scientific thing on talk:cladhexea if you 2 don’t like that then Search the placozoa species on Wikipedia and go to the talk. Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 00:02, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok sooooooo I will need to wait for 13 days and I will recap on “…” every day so, and I wish this argument ends so bye? Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 00:20, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you are going to do so, you will risk being indefinitely blocked and having your talk page access removed. - UtherSRG (talk) 01:06, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't use reliable sources. https://wiki.scholarship.edu.vn/Cladhexea and https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Cladhexea are both Wikipedia:Mirrors of the existing page, they shouldn't be used as sources (see also WP:CIRCULAR). Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 00:40, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Atlas, this madness needs to stop. This talk page is not for drafts. I tried to read over this page, and I'm wondering how far we are removed from an indefinite block for disruption--you may want to look at WP:CIR. If you continue with that kind of talk, I will not have any other option but to remove talk page access. Drmies (talk) 01:05, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Drmies after 13 days I’ll edit the article. Happy?(happĩ?) Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 01:23, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The point of being blocked is to reflect on how it is you have disrupted the community, and figure out how to not do so in the future. If you are going to simply stew for two weeks and then resume editing in a disruptive manner, you will be blocked indefinitely. - UtherSRG (talk) 01:26, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wait okay ill forget about it. Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 01:29, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Since you decided to WP:LOUTSOCK (see this edit), I'm extending your block to a month from now. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:44, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. UtherSRG (talk) 11:43, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Atlas Þə Biologist! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, and once your short block expires, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Also, you can use your user sandbox for test editing or making drafts of new or improved articles.

Finally, please note the recent edits I made to your user pages on other projects, to make images into "thumbnail" size.

Happy editing! Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 08:09, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What is an obelisk? (Sub article)

In biology an obelisk is a rod shaped wild RNA that infects cells like viroids, viruses, etc…

obelisk are viroid’s more complex cousins sorta. They were found in humans partially in the mouth infecting Streptococcus sanguinis. The obelisk probably has an important place in evolutionary tree of life; in the image you see that I put on Wikimedia commons we see the obelisk. They are the last wRNA (wild RNA) we see in till viruses. We think there could be around 43,000 species of obelisk. Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 05:00, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'm not sure how accurate this tree of life is, I don't know any phylogenies that nest cellular life inside viruses. Viruses don't even necessarily share common descent (see Realm (virology)), with several known instances of virus coming into existence from stray plasmids. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 05:13, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

By plasmids do you mean wild RNA? Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 05:17, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mucoromyceta moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Mucoromyceta. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 22:53, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That’s funny because I was just about to put resources… Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 22:57, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Atlas Þə Biologist, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:08, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mucoromyceta has been accepted

Mucoromyceta, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

NotAGenious (talk) 04:29, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]