User talk:Athiyurbala
Welcome
[edit]
|
Athiyurbala, you are invited to the Teahouse
[edit]Hi Athiyurbala! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
December 2013
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Athiyur, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Cmr08 (talk) 09:04, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
Athiyur
[edit]Hi Athiyurbala. I didn't protect the Athiyur article. Cmr08 is helping you by correcting your English, so there's no reason for protection. If you write strange English, it is normal for other editors to correct what you wrote. In English, we don't put every word in capitals.
- This is bad: "Very Soon, Kumbakonam become a District."
- This is better: "Very soon, Kumbakonam will become a district."
Also, you need to have sources for the facts you put in articles. See this guide for how to add sources. And please ask me if you have any questions. All the best — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 03:24, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 27
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Athiyur, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aduthurai (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
January 2014
[edit]Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your image was inserted successfully on the page Athiyur, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Cmr08 (talk) 06:24, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
February 2014
[edit]Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Athiyur, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 04:02, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
Your addition to Athiyur has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 04:57, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
Please do not add inappropriate images to Wikipedia, as you did to Athiyur; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Carriearchdale (talk) 07:53, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Thank you.
Carriearchdale (talk) 06:56, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- @Carriearchdale: Actually, these edits weren't vandalism. They broke the page formatting, yes, but that doesn't count as vandalism by itself. The edits have to be made in bad faith for them to be vandalism, and most editors here follow that definition strictly. Best — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 07:26, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello again Athiyubala. I see people have left you more messages about the Athiyur article. I also see that you made some mistakes that messed up the article formatting, and that you added things that look like advertising. Sorry, but you can't advertise on Wikipedia. What would you like to add to the article? Please tell me, and we can make the article better and follow Wikipedia's rules too. Best regards — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 07:21, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
STOP!
[edit]Please stop! If you make any more strange edits to Athiyur, I will have to block you.
I don't want to block you, so please talk to us. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 14:43, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Blocked
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Deville (Talk) 16:26, 6 February 2014 (UTC)Speedy deletion nomination of வேளாண்மை
[edit]Hello Athiyurbala,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged வேளாண்மை for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, [[{{{article}}}]].
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Wgolf (talk) 04:58, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of வேளாண்மை
[edit]Hello Athiyurbala,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged வேளாண்மை for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ankitreloaded (talk) 08:19, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
You have been blocked for copyright violations
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 03:58, 27 February 2014 (UTC)Your article தேவனாஞ்சேரி
[edit]Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page தேவனாஞ்சேரி to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It currently has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. WWGB (talk) 05:37, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Athiyurbala: I have deleted the article. We already have an article here in English, Devanancheri; I see you have been expanding it; and ta:தேவனாஞ்சேரி also already exists. So, thank you, but please instead keep on improving the English-language article. Yngvadottir (talk) 12:59, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
June 2014
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 04:18, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Athiyurbala (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I want create New (Different)Articles
Decline reason:
No valid block reason given, and per WP:COMPETENCE. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:43, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Athiyurbala (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I want to Update valuable details about my articles
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. PhilKnight (talk) 15:55, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.