User talk:Atheist1981

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. Floyd (talk) 10:56, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Sean Hannity

I reverted the disruptive edit you made to Sean Hannity article. If you really think the article is flawed, please go ahead and propose genuine reliably sourced criticisms of the subject on the article talk page. Trying to blank the page to show your displeasure is considered vandalism in wikipedia and please be aware that continuation of this practice could get you into trouble editing here. Good luck otherwise. Docku^Hi 03:47, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Well, you have done it again. Please consider this as a warning. If you continue doing this, you could get blocked. Docku^Hi 03:50, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

r u foxnews?

You are funny. I am not. Docku^Hi 03:52, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Sept. 2008

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Juan Williams, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Mhking (talk) 03:58, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

September 2008

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Juan Williams. Miquonranger03 (talk) 18:57, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

The user seems to be new and does not seem to be aware of wikipedia policies. Blogs are generally not considered reliable sources. Please read wikipedia policies reliable sources and citing references for guidelines for your future editing here. Pls drop me a line in my talk page if you have any questions. Docku^Hi 19:29, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Ok I removed the part you called opinion, which i think the people here at fox news are offended by. i just don't understand that you keep undoing my edits, and you don't help it be corrected. You people acknowledge my bias without acknowledging your own

Well, there is no problem in adding the criticism you proposed if you can provide references which are reliable such as New York times and Washington post and if you convince us that it does not violate other wp policies such as WP:NPOV. The best way to add controversial issues is first propose it in article talk pages, get consensus from other editors. Docku^Hi 20:34, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Juan Williams, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Mhking (talk) 23:28, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at Talk:Keith Olbermann, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Gamaliel (talk) 05:59, 10 September 2008 (UTC) This is the last warning you will receive for your deleting comments you don't agree with. Thats ur opnion that its disruptive. u delete my comment on the discussion page? this isn't china, if u dont agree on something u rebutt it, u dont delete something. this is exactly what the discussion was about. people like u feeling that u make the rules and standards here

We have rules here on Wikipedia regarding conduct towards other users. Please see WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA. Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. Gamaliel (talk) 13:39, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

[personal attack removed]. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.113.168.128 (talk) 04:09, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Funny that the other day, someone called him a "raving conservative McCain-zombie pig". So, which is it? J.delanoy^gabs_adds 04:12, 13 September 2008 (UTC)