Jump to content

User talk:Astigitana

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Astigitana, you are invited to the Teahouse

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Astigitana! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Help request for NetOwl

[edit]

Hi Astigitana and thanks for your message. I think it is better to have a fresh eye on articles that I've previously reviewed, but I'm happy to assist with some feedback.

The article is looking stronger from a referencing point of view, although you need to ensure all references do actually support the statements made. I'd be concerned that the Products section remains unreferenced – this makes it more likely that another editor will criticise it on grounds of promotion/advertising or simply question why info is in there if you can't evidence it with valid external references. Might it be better to give a summarised list along the lines of 'products include', listing only those products you can support with external refs? Remember it's fine to use refs multiple times within one article to support different statements.

I'd move History above products – that's my personal preference as it gives background before discussing current status. Note that the first paragraph of History doesn't have sources. Without a reference, you will quite possibly be challenged for the statement "It was one of the first English named entity extraction products available", even if you personally know this to be true. Currently history also duplicates information within Products (again unsourced), so you might want to address this.

I would definitely take off the ® at first use of NetOwl – again a personal viewpoint, but I think trademark symbols are ugly and counter-productive within articles, although fine on logos in infoboxes. Inserting them also suggests you are pushing a brand message. Coca-Cola and Minute Maid don't have trademark symbols on Wikipedia, nor does the Washington Post article you are now citing about NetOwl (this, by the way, would be a good supporting reference for NameMatcher), so I'm not sure I'd bother as it's clear it's a registered entity.

In general, it’s better to start with a shorter and really well-supported article that can then evolve over time as more references become available than one that hits repeated problems due to lack of sources. Hope that helps. Libby norman (talk) 11:23, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC NetOwl (August 4)

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Astigitana. You have new messages at Tazerdadog's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Astigitana. You have new messages at Tazerdadog's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Astigitana. You have new messages at Tazerdadog's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your submission at AfC NetOwl was accepted

[edit]
NetOwl, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

APerson (talk!) 12:37, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Astigitana. You have new messages at APerson's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

APerson (talk!) 01:39, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]