User talk:Assistant75

Welcome

Hello, Assistant75, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Assistant75, good luck, and have fun. DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 17:47, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Roy Clinton (“Bud”) Johns, Jr.

The article Roy Clinton (“Bud”) Johns, Jr. has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:59, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We have been gathering information and are now ready to edit. Could this be restored please? Assistant75 (talk) 15:46, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Roy Clinton (“Bud”) Johns, Jr.

The article Roy Clinton (“Bud”) Johns, Jr. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable individual lacking support to establish notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 00:59, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Add all available major significant sourcing.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Assistant75/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 19:56, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Assistant75/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Assistant75/sandbox. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 21:52, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Assistant75/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Assistant75/sandbox. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 22:05, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bud Johns (April 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The online sources hardly do any more than simply mention him. The offline sources appear to be his own works, which as PRIMARY sources are strongly discouraged. Please add additional independent reliable sources that discuss the subject in detail.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bud Johns and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 02:12, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Bud Johns concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Bud Johns, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Bud Johns concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Bud Johns, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Roy Clinton (“Bud”) Johns, Jr. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roy Clinton (“Bud”) Johns, Jr. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roy Clinton (“Bud”) Johns, Jr. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix (talk) 22:06, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Assistant75, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

reddogsix (talk) 22:48, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

a cautious welcome

Hi. A word of advice. It would have been wiser to begin your editing career by editing a series of existing articles on topics about which you know something, adding properly sourced information to articles like Ride and Tie that need better sourcing, as a way of beginning to understand how an encyclopedia article should be written and what kinds of sources are acceptable. You should also try making improvement to bio articles, starting with existing pages about people whose work you know and admire. This is the best way to prepare yourself to begin writing articles. In re: Bud Johns, the sole useful thing you can now do is to bring to the page some blue chip sources, articles in WP:RS that detail unsourced, or inadequately sourced sections of text. Also, you might track down a working link that college alumni association bio of Johns, such sources are regarded as reliable sources on the facts of an individual's career and life, but the link on the page does not lead to the article. That said, I hope that you will stick around and help build this encyclopedia. It is not at all unusual for an editor to have a rocky start here, you just have to climb back into the saddle and learn to edit properly. It is usually best to edit on topics that you know something about, but not on the pages of individuals or institutions with which you are personally involved. Cheers, and welcome aboard.E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:40, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi thereI just wanted to let you know I made numerous edits to Roy BUd Johns wiki page. Please let me know how to proceed. I want to make sure it gets reviewed for publication. THanks!

Assistant75

Good morning. I’m just making sure my edits were seen. Can you confirm with me that my proposed page on Bud Johns is being reviewed for publication? Thanks! Assistant75 (talk) 12:46, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]