User talk:Aspaa
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Aspaa, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 20:12, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
April 2015
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Eurovision Song Contest's Greatest Hits, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject Eurovision/Format and Guides#TBD vs TBA for more details. Wes Mouse | T@lk 17:34, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Recent edit to Scissor Sisters
[edit]Hey. Since it's an American article, meager is preferred. Thank you! ~ NottNott let's talk! contrib 00:19, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
May 2016
[edit]Hello, I'm Egghead06. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Joey Barton has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Egghead06 (talk) 18:07, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 27
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- BBC News (TV channel)
- added a link pointing to Huw Edwards
- The Film Review
- added a link pointing to Ben Brown
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
July 2017
[edit]Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at George Gardiner (politician), you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 19:22, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
- @Binksternet: That warning seems a little strong for what appears to be a good faith edit. Do you think I'm missing something? I realize you are using a template, but the wording suggest this is a continuing problem while it looks to me like a one-off issue and maybe not even disruptive.--S Philbrick(Talk) 21:47, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Aspaa. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 26
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Royal Christmas Message, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2017 London attack (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Merger Proposal
[edit]An article that you have been involved in editing—Public Space Protection Order—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WPCW (talk • contribs) 12:11, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Aspaa. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Aspaa. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Disambiguation link notification for July 22
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited BBC News (TV channel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Watson. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]June 2022
[edit]This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in COVID-19, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Bakkster Man (talk) 13:54, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Learn!
[edit]https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.106.252.209 (talk) 16:13, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Why I reverted your post at Talk:Eugenics
[edit]It truly breaks my heart to read this, but you still cannot use the article talk page as a WP:FORUM. I hope that makes sense. If you have specific changes, backed up by reliable sources, which you would like to discuss, feel free to discuss them.
Also, since this is a user talk page, I'll offer this: I am just one person, but I believe that you have worth and value just as you are. People who talk about "genetic quality" are making subjective judgements dressed up like science. They are simply wrong. There is not and never has been any scientific rationale for judging one person's qualities to be better than another's. One set of qualities may be more fitted to a given environment, but if that environment were to change, another set of qualities might be favored. There is no absolute position from which to judge fitness apart from environment. And of course we humans largely create our environment, though by no means with perfect control. And then there is the mistaken view that homogeneity is always beneficial for a species. It isn't. Rather, diversity –– including neurodiversity –– is a strength. Eugenics is rightly described as pseudoscience because it ignores these and other facts. Generalrelative (talk) 02:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Ah, but it's not actually my own thought but arose from more than one person away from Wikipedia thinking this - I would have had sources at the time more so to back this up and may take more time to find where I originally found them now, would have kept a record if I had edited the article itself but I felt it was highly contested and therefore used the talk page. I therefore was not using the talk page as a forum for my own original thought, instead based on other people's thoughts not merely my own. Even if this may not have been obvious to people just reading the talk page. The general position is that it is still a fringe theory and wouldn't be accepted that it was mainstream. However, that is by the bias in the definition itself as if it was mainstream-accepted, the mainstream would then never accept that it was. So, by definition, it will always fail based on what is generally considered to be the case. Despite the fact the view is held by people beyond myself and does appear to have evidenced basis as much of the rest of society has fallen into groupthink, cognitive dissonance and normalization of deviance (again, not just my idea) - but, again, it is just exhaustive and would require hours of work for me to find all the sources to back myself up on this so therefore in practice I am effectively prevented from doing so, as we all have limited resources/ability. Aspaa (talk) 21:47, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)