User talk:Asmiov12345
September 2022
[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Funcrunch (talk) 22:18, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 01:40, 9 September 2022 (UTC)- Excuse me, none of my edits were rejected, and everything done was in line with my best understanding of wikipedia policies, including pushing WP:AGF. I have had this account for quite a while, and this seems to not be a responsible or respectful block in line with malfeasance. I kindly request information on why I was blocked from editing. Asmiov12345 (talk) 01:52, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- As noted in the block log, all of your edits so far have been to argue over sensitive topics and promote a battleground mentality. Calling other editors "children" was the last straw. If you're interested in editing about topics unrelated to gender, I am open to a conditional unblock. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 01:55, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- While I respect your assertion, one edit was calling for good faith over a needless insult against another user, one was providing some context with regard to a claim made previously with lackluster evidence, and the last one was a needless insult, but im sure you can appreciate is frustrating watching a resource fall victim to an active edit war that seems to be continuing and you banning me while I am trying to get protection to a page to slow down the still active edit war, which is in line with wikipedias policy of de-escalation with regard to a continuing edit war. I can certainly appreciate a sensitive topic, which is why I have pushed to keep in line with WP policies regarding gender issues, but I feel this ban was needless. If you want to push a conditional unban that is fine, I will move back to discussing flavoproteins, however I feel this was a knee jerk reaction, given one of the edits explicitly cannot and should not be interpreted in anyway to be inflaming tensions if you truly believe in the WP:AGF policies of WP. Asmiov12345 (talk) 02:02, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- I did partly action your protection request, for what it's worth—semi, not full. As to the rest, it's up to you how to proceed: If you're okay with the conditional unblock, I can do that now. (You can always appeal the restriction later, to me and/or WP:AN. Also, I misspoke: Our standard topic area delineation here is "gender-related disputes or controversies and people associated with them", not the slightly broader topic area of gender.) If you'd like a full unblock, you can use the unblock process described above; I'll say in advance that if the reviewing admin is inclined to grant a full unblock, I won't object. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 02:10, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- I appreciate it, I will move forward with the conditional unblock, as a note I do fully plan to appeal the block at a later date, as there other topics regarding tobacco chemistry I also seek to upgrade. I do apologize for my heated/inappropriate protection request for what its worth. May you have a wonderful rest of your day/night. Asmiov12345 (talk) 02:17, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- I have unblocked you, conditional on not editing about
gender-related disputes or controversies and people associated with them
. Note that all topic bans on Wikipedia are construed broadly. That is to say, when in doubt about whether something falls under this restriction, assume that it does. You can always ask me if you have any clarification questions. Happy editing. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 02:22, 9 September 2022 (UTC)- Cheers, and for what its worth thank you for living up to your bio
- Happy Hunting Asmiov12345 (talk) 02:25, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- I have unblocked you, conditional on not editing about
- I appreciate it, I will move forward with the conditional unblock, as a note I do fully plan to appeal the block at a later date, as there other topics regarding tobacco chemistry I also seek to upgrade. I do apologize for my heated/inappropriate protection request for what its worth. May you have a wonderful rest of your day/night. Asmiov12345 (talk) 02:17, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- I did partly action your protection request, for what it's worth—semi, not full. As to the rest, it's up to you how to proceed: If you're okay with the conditional unblock, I can do that now. (You can always appeal the restriction later, to me and/or WP:AN. Also, I misspoke: Our standard topic area delineation here is "gender-related disputes or controversies and people associated with them", not the slightly broader topic area of gender.) If you'd like a full unblock, you can use the unblock process described above; I'll say in advance that if the reviewing admin is inclined to grant a full unblock, I won't object. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 02:10, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- While I respect your assertion, one edit was calling for good faith over a needless insult against another user, one was providing some context with regard to a claim made previously with lackluster evidence, and the last one was a needless insult, but im sure you can appreciate is frustrating watching a resource fall victim to an active edit war that seems to be continuing and you banning me while I am trying to get protection to a page to slow down the still active edit war, which is in line with wikipedias policy of de-escalation with regard to a continuing edit war. I can certainly appreciate a sensitive topic, which is why I have pushed to keep in line with WP policies regarding gender issues, but I feel this ban was needless. If you want to push a conditional unban that is fine, I will move back to discussing flavoproteins, however I feel this was a knee jerk reaction, given one of the edits explicitly cannot and should not be interpreted in anyway to be inflaming tensions if you truly believe in the WP:AGF policies of WP. Asmiov12345 (talk) 02:02, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- As noted in the block log, all of your edits so far have been to argue over sensitive topics and promote a battleground mentality. Calling other editors "children" was the last straw. If you're interested in editing about topics unrelated to gender, I am open to a conditional unblock. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 01:55, 9 September 2022 (UTC)