User talk:Ashobiz

what the >¢}%/%"% ????

Hello . I don't understand what you did and any messages to me should be on my talk page not user page. Please reply with details of your edit. Roughcutmav (talk) 14:04, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. My mistake. You made image vandalism in Jayalalithaa's page. Ashok (talk) 14:38, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tenaliraman (film)

That citation supported the box office gross. So it is not spam. Jim1138 (talk) 08:23, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The citation should be from reliable source. I don't see the website http://www.boxofficetotal.com reliable and i don't find any info about the moving making 25 Crores in day 6.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Tenaliraman (film). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 08:47, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am just trying to keep Wikipeida SPAM free. The site which you are citing is a SPAM and it has the word "no" in "Privacy Policy" page.

Why do you think it wp:spam? It does not fit the WP:CITESPAM criteria. It does not have pricing. It does have ads which many sites do and I don't see that as a concern. It seems to support the article's information. You are welcome to replace the citation with another. Please don't remove it and leave it without any citation. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 09:04, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No. The site has ads. What it doesn't have is Design, Information and Reference for the data. I already cited the article with reliable source but it didn't went live because of Edit War.

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 04:37, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Signing in

Hi Ashobiz,

I don't know if you know, but it is best to sign in before editing Wikipedia, otherwise you reveal your IP address. The best way to tell if you are signed in is to look in the top-right corner and see if your user name is there.

Yaris678 (talk) 17:50, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Thanks. I was using different laptop while posting. I won't let this happen in future. Ashok (talk) 01:45, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Android Market redirect

For some reason you replaced a redirect to Google Play with a three-year-old copy of the Android Market article, with an edit summary "removed link". This stayed in place for a few months before anyone realised what had happened and restored the redirect. If a redirect flagged as "result of merge" seems wrong, it's worth checking for discussions to see why the merge was made (here it is). If there was no discussion and you decide to undo it yourself, you shouldn't use a version of the article from three years previously. --McGeddon (talk) 12:20, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Flipkart, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Thomas.W ^talk 09:20, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info. Added reference. Ashok (talk) 09:31, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/K.L.N.Krishnan

Hello Ashobiz. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "K.L.N.Krishnan".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/K.L.N.Krishnan}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 00:33, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Currently I don't have any plans to edit the article since I need to collect lot of information. Moreover most of the information doesn't seems to have reference. Ashok (talk) 00:53, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ashobiz. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]