User talk:Ashliveslove/Archives/2011/November

Speedy deletion nomination of Alexia Barlier

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Alexia Barlier requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text -- which means allowing other people to modify it -- then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. bonadea contributions talk 08:09, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Screenshot of Bane.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Screenshot of Bane.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:46, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

August 2011

Your recent edit to the page Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - Part 2 appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 00:29, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:FF5 rio hiest screenshot.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FF5 rio hiest screenshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:55, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Kudis Theamritwafa (talk) 12:57, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Enjoy!! Theamritwafa (talk) 12:59, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:On_sets_on_aazaan.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:On_sets_on_aazaan.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 12:16, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Infobox The Big Bang Theory season 1 episode list

A tag has been placed on Template:Infobox The Big Bang Theory season 1 episode list requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. AussieLegend (talk) 04:14, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:The Big Bang Theory episodes

A tag has been placed on Template:The Big Bang Theory episodes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. AussieLegend (talk) 04:31, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

The Big Bang Theory

Your contributions are appreciated but please note that television episode articles must meet the same notability requirements as any other articles and the articles that you've created do not establish notability. Articles that are essentially just a plot summary generally do not survive nomination for deletion and adding content that is already covered in episode lists generally does not establish notability. There are not enough notable episodes to justify creation of a separate template. All of the notable episodes are easily handled by {{The Big Bang Theory}}, so {{The Big Bang Theory episodes}} is completely unnecessary. --AussieLegend (talk) 07:06, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of The Big Bran Hypothesis (The Big Bang Theory) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Big Bran Hypothesis (The Big Bang Theory) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Big Bran Hypothesis (The Big Bang Theory) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. AussieLegend (talk) 07:10, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:The Big Bang Theory episodes

Template:The Big Bang Theory episodes has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. AussieLegend (talk) 07:22, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Thanks for contributing to Soundtrack (movie) article.. AbhiSuryawanshi (talk) 09:12, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Amber Rose Revah

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Amber Rose Revah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. WWGB (talk) 13:48, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Deletion

If you plan on drilling my 1000 messages forget it. Kindly ask for an article to be expanded instead. Look at the articles on German wikipedia instead of looking at what the article has right now.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:51, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

STOP!! The interwiki tags are the difference. Have you even looked on the other wikipedia and even considered wikipedia would be better off having the article in English?? .♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:55, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Ravioli (TV series), easily expanded. Please just kindly ask if you want anything expanded, it works wonders.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:56, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

See if one just writes an article with nothing in it and saves it. Then it remains there as it is for more than 10 days. I do see the creation date of the article before tagging it. If its a recent one I just tag it as New Article. ASHU^IND 15:04, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

I'm not the usual contributor on wikipedia. These articles are started initially as a sort of bridge to stage a transfer of content. Yes, ideally every articles would be fully transferred and sourced first time but there is so much content missing from other wikipedias I find this an efficient way to at least start towards building them. The intertranswiki links are the important aspect of this which renders them different from any old unverifiable stub. Anyway please consider removing your speedy tag of College (television series) and consider clicking on the google translate link in the templates and you can view the content which should be put in the article asap rather than deleted. It will be much more productive for wikipedia to have these in the long term. Thanks.♦ Dr. Blofeld

Sure. I'll do that straight away. Just write something in it so that articles don't seem empty. Many people just do that to increase their edits on Wiki.ASHU^IND 15:17, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

I can assure you I couldn't care less about edit count. I care, perhaps too much about wikipedia being the most comprehensive, resourceful website it can possibly be... Which is why identifying the missing articles and attempting to start to get articles put into English is a start. And in turn they identify notable missing articles like this beauty.. I speak neither German or Italian so I couldn't translate with great confidence. Google translate at least for Itlaian is understandable.I asked a German editor to proof read the awful plot I added in haste.♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:22, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

I see you are a member of WP:Indian cinema. Well I started most of the Indian film articles we have, but need help with expanding them!! You are welcome to join WP:Actors, a project I founded. But remove that damn speedy tag ASAP LOL!!♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:25, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Yup. I can help on Indian Cinema. Joining your initiative. But tell me how to remove that tag from your article. Will just undoing it work? ASHU^IND 15:30, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Welcome. here, simply remove db-a1 at the top and click save..♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:35, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Done ASHU^IND 15:40, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. What are you favourite Indian movies? I got Mother India promoted to GA,.. That's a classic. Sholay is supposed to be the greatest though..♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:48, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Yeah. Mother India and Sholay are classics and blockbusters of their era. Don is also a nice one. Now-a-days stories are getting less importance and special effects are taking precedence.ASHU^IND 16:08, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

P.S. a kind word of advice. I would lay off with the speedy deletion tags. Teri Meri is clearly legitimate and not nonsense, even if it should probably merged into the main article..♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:55, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

An article about single song of Indian film is really close to non-sense. You know India releases more than 100 films per year each with 5-7 songs. If each song gets an article it'll be chaos on wiki. All such things are covered in Music section. I've posted same advice on creator's talk page too ASHU^IND 16:02, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

The nonsense deletion tag is for incoherent spam. You should have placed a notability and a merge tag on it. I agree, it would be ridiculous to cover every song in an Indian film!! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:22, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Halo Brute Chieftain.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Halo Brute Chieftain.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. We hope (talk) 17:21, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Halo Drone.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Halo Drone.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. We hope (talk) 17:21, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Halo Elite.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Halo Elite.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. We hope (talk) 17:21, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Halo Engineer.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Halo Engineer.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. We hope (talk) 17:21, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Halo grunt.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Halo grunt.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. We hope (talk) 17:21, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:HALO Hunter.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HALO Hunter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. We hope (talk) 17:21, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Halo jackal.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Halo jackal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. We hope (talk) 17:21, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Halo Prophet.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Halo Prophet.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. We hope (talk) 17:21, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Non free files can't be used for galleries. We hope (talk) 17:21, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to WikiProject Animation

Hi, Ashliveslove/Archives/2011, welcome to WikiProject Animation! We are a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to identifying, categorizing, and improving coverage of topics related to animation. Some points that may be helpful: Our main aim is to help improve animation-related articles, so if someone asks for help with an article, please try your hardest to help them if you are able. Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it. The project has several ongoing and developing activities, such as article quality assessment, all of which you are welcome to take part in. Our project has a Manual of Style guidelines which tries to help editors improve the quality of Wikipedia's articles within the scope of animation-related articles. For Wikipedia guidelines regarding how to write about fiction in general, see Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (writing about fiction). If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the talk page, and we will be happy to help you. And once again - Welcome! - JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 10:51, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Poster license

The tag for this is Non-free poster and you can find it under Promotional material here We hope (talk) 16:24, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Thnx ASHU^IND 16:55, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Tilt 2011 Bulgarian film poster.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Tilt 2011 Bulgarian film poster.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 21:16, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

flags

Please read WP:MOSFLAG and you will see that the flag does not belong in film templates. Specifically, it says "Generally, flag icons should not be used in infoboxes, even when there is a "country", "nationality" or equivalent field: they are unnecessarily distracting and give undue prominence to one field among many." BollyJeff || talk 11:47, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Ohh.. sorry about that.. I saw a few articles of Indian Films with the flag thats why I added the flag. ASHU^IND 12:13, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

If you see them, remove them. thanks. BollyJeff || talk 13:22, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Prometheus-Poster 2012 film.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Prometheus-Poster 2012 film.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:08, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

WP:AWB

Hello Ashliveslove. You have requested AWB, and you seem to meet most of the requirements. Please consider enabling an email address in Special:Preferences. (Note the section called 'E-mail options'). This will make it easier for others to contact you if you use AWB to make mass edits. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 15:00, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

I'v activated my email. Now please give me access to AWB ASHU^IND 15:35, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Halo logo for template.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Halo logo for template.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 21:31, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Robotropolis

I just thought I'd let you know that I saw your article Robotropolis in the New Articles list-- However, I think the article seems to contain a few errors: the references in the article do not follow Wikipedia guidelines. There is a tutorial on formatting citations at Wikipedia:Referencing.Amy Z (talk) 15:20, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Bail Enforcers poster.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Bail Enforcers poster.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 19:57, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Its from the official website of the film. And is a promotional material. I guess due to slow net connection its not uploaded with proper details. Remove that deletion tag so that i can correct the source please. ASHU^IND 20:03, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sathyam cinema company logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sathyam cinema company logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:26, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Umbrage (film)

The article Umbrage (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails notability guidelines for films: limited release with no major critical reviews.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Danger (talk) 04:55, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Some tips to help you out!

Hi Ashliveslove/Archives/2011, I thought I'd drop a few notes on your talk page with some help on writing articles :o)

First of all, it may be best for you to do a bit of reading, starting with the Wikipedia manual of style, which will give you a lot of information about how Wikipedia prefers its articles to be written. It's not as hard to follow as it might look; quite a bit of the information there probably won't be vital for you at first.

Second, I recommend you make a user sandbox - which is just an area you can use to practise in, and to make notes in, and to get things ready in. If you click this red link: user:Ashliveslove/Archives/2011/Sandbox, that will let you create that page (it gives you an edit window to start work in). Anything, anywhere, on the help and information pages which gives you an example, try it out in your sandbox until you're familiar with it.

For your article, the next thing you want to do is start collecting as much information as you can about it. Google searches (particularly in Books and Scholar) will be your best friend for this! Once you've found the information, the next most important thing is to start writing up each fact in your own words (very important, this), and make a note at the same time of exactly where that information came from. Build in the references as you go along; I'm going to copy in, down below this, a whole heap of help on doing references, which was produced by one of our best teachers (Chzz).

Here's another place that you'll find incredibly useful - citation templates which you can copy and paste into your sandbox, between <ref></ref> tags; you just fill in the blanks from your sources into the template, and you'll end up with nicely formatted inline citations :o) It all helps. Remember to add a references section to your sandbox (make a new line, and put ==References== on it, and type {{reflist}} on the next line, so that you can see how your citations look as you do them. Remember to save your page often! You don't want to lose your work.

Hopefully this will give you a good start and make life easier for you.

One last thing to keep as a motto: "It's better to write one good, well-referenced, nicely-presented article than it is to create fifty unreferenced one-line stubs!" Pesky (talk ...stalk!) 08:14, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

How references work

Simple references

These require two parts;

a)

Chzz is 98 years old.<ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref>

He likes tea. <ref> [http://www.nicecupofteaandasitdown.com Tea website] </ref>

b) A section called "References" with the special code "{{reflist}}";

== References ==
{{reflist}}

(an existing article is likely to already have one of these sections)

To see the result of that, please look at user:chzz/demo/simpleref. Edit it, and check the code; perhaps make a test page of your own, such as user:Ashliveslove/Archives/2011/reftest and try it out.

Named references

Chzz was born in 1837. <ref name=MyBook>
"The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. 
</ref> 

Chzz lives in Footown.<ref name=MyBook/>

Note that the second usage has a / (and no closing ref tag). This needs a reference section as above; please see user:chzz/demo/namedref to see the result.

Citation templates

You can put anything you like between <ref> and </ref>, but using citation templates makes for a neat, consistent look;

Chzz has 37 Olympic medals. <ref> {{Citation
 | last = Smith
 | first = John
 | title = Olympic medal winners of the 20th century
 | publication-date = 2001
 | publisher = [[Cambridge University Press]]
 | page = 125
 | isbn = 0-521-37169-4
}}
</ref>

Please see user:chzz/demo/citeref to see the result.

For more help and tips on that subject, see user:chzz/help/refs.

Something to make your life easier!

Hi there Ashliveslove/Archives/2011! I've just come across one of your articles, and noticed that you had to create titles for your url links manually, or were using bare urls as references.

You might want to consider using this tool - it makes your life a whole heap easier, by filling in complete citation templates for your links. All you do is install the script on Special:MyPage/common.js, or or Special:MyPage/vector.js, then paste the bare url (without [...] brackets) between your <ref></ref> tabs, and you'll find a clickable link called Reflinks in your toolbox section of the page (probably in the left hand column). Then click that tool. It does all the rest of the work (provided that you remember to save the page! It doesn't work for everything (particularly often not for pdf documents), but for pretty much anything ending in "htm" or "html" (and with a title) it will do really, really well. Happy editing! Pesky (talk ...stalk!) 08:14, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Umbrage (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Umbrage (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Umbrage (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Danger (talk) 09:22, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

I'd like to let you know that I nominated this article, in great part, out of respect for your time and effort. I believe that it would be disrespectful to you to have you spend more time and energy on an article that does not meet inclusion standards and thus may be deleted in the future. I should have left you a note initially, rather than an impersonal template, and I'm sorry for that. Danger (talk) 22:45, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

I've created that article since it is linked with other wiki articles. Simply I'm bringing more new film debutantes, directors etc since I'm also part of Wikipedia:WikiProject_Actors_and_Filmmakers ASHU^IND 22:54, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

If you visit the AFD discussion...

...you will find that I have found and listed several rather decent artices about the film which can be used to expand and source the article. While I feel the AFD nomination was unneccessary, now that it has been so nominated, best we deal with the issues raised by the nominator. Add those found sources to your article, and let us know at the discussion that you have done so. And thank you for bringing a notable topic to these pages. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 18:04, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

thanks. m still expanding it. ASHU^IND 18:28, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Understood, and I apolgize for any impatience shown by others. Keep up the good efforts. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 19:27, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Ashliveslove. You have new messages at MichaelQSchmidt's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Real Steel

Hello! I saw your message at Talk:Real Steel and wanted to suggest being careful when adding new messages. You removed some of the other messages as seen here. I recommend adding a new message on a talk page by clicking "New section" at the top. As for working on Real Steel, I can help provide sources. Let me know if there is anything specific you think should be covered, such as visual effects. Happy editing! Erik (talk | contribs) 14:06, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Sorry about that. Something must've gone wrong wen I opened whole talk page for Article Assessment. ASHU^IND 14:13, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

No worries! Sometimes I hit rollback on my watchlist and accidentally undo someone's comment or edit. It happens. Erik (talk | contribs) 14:26, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of A Haunting in Salem

The article A Haunting in Salem has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreviewed brand new direct to video movie. No google news hits.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gaijin42 (talk) 20:51, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Remove that deletion tag. Article is still under-construction. ASHU^IND 20:58, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of A Haunting in Salem

The article A Haunting in Salem has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eeekster (talk) 21:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, although really MQS deserves all the credit.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:25, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Stakeland screenshot.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Stakeland screenshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:29, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

I saw no courtesy notification...

...but that point is moot as you are already aware that your new article A Haunting in Salem was sent to deletion discussion. I was able to add KTLA and Consumer Reports as having written of the film... the first in detail and the latter only briefly. If the article is deleted, I urge you ask the closing administrator to WP:USERFY it to you in a user workspace. The fact that I so quickly forund at least two decent reliable sources speaking toward the film when the nominator claimed no news hits bodes well for a film so recently released on DVD. I expect more. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 09:07, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

I'm getting headaches now. I start an article, save it, and within seconds it is tagged for deletion... ASHU^IND 14:53, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

I wonder what will happen if ppl be more creative thn destructive. ASHU^IND 14:58, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

B-Class checklist for WikiProject Animation

Greeting, I am a coordinator for WikiProject Animation. A B-Class checklist will be added to the project banner, along with the work group text, including the importance function. The B-Class checklist will include 6 point parameters to assess against the criteria. If you have any questions, please discuss at our talk page. Thank for your time. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 00:19, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mi ghost protocol poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mi ghost protocol poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:02, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Halo: Combat Evolved Anniversary cleanup tags

Hi. Please stop removing the cleanup tags from Halo: Combat Evolved Anniversary until the grammatical errors in the article have been corrected. Given that the game will be coming out soon, it is important that they be fixed. GeeCee (talk) 05:47, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

The content is written in such a way that even after release one should not have to change all the tenses in the game. Saves time since release is only 10 days from now. ASHU^IND 06:33, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

He is talking about the grammar, not the tense. I was going to do it myself, but my grammar skills just aren't good enough to fully fix it. -Jer ^{Hit me up} 07:26, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Same is my case. I advice leaving the head tag and removing the sub-heading tags. Header tag is sufficient. What do you think? ASHU^IND 07:30, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Re: Nomination of ...Baby One More Time

WOW That was fast! Thank you so much for reviewing this article! This is one of the several that I worked hard! Thanks again. :) - Saulo ^{Talk to Me} 00:31, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

You are welcome. Found no problem in article and found it passing in every point in check list. ASHU^IND 05:39, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

File:1298693685bfef991d9a4fcaec3c86d4ef34b7f4cb.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1298693685bfef991d9a4fcaec3c86d4ef34b7f4cb.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 10:02, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Sarah Prikryl in playing house.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sarah Prikryl in playing house.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 10:04, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Lucky One film poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Lucky One film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:45, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Your GA reviews

I notice you have taken on a lot of GA reviews recently. It is great to see you so keen, but as you are relatively new here it might pay to slow down a bit. While reviews are relatively easy to do they do take a bit of work to make sure they meet the criteria and it can take some time to complete them. Looking over your recent ones I see you have failed one for being at AFD, and asking for another to meet B class first, which are incorrect. Some of your passed articles look like they have only been only given a brief review. You might want to read one of the essays on reviewing or get a mentor. AIRcorn (talk) 09:48, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for suggestion. I was just reviewing articles which were there for more than a month. I'm checking for everything since I've no other work. For spellings, grammar, using all tools available on wiki and even the talk pages. That B-class suggestion was because article was of a well known person but still seemed some sort of incomplete, thats why I put it on hold since I wasnt certain what to do with it and hoped that someone experienced will see that. I accept that the first one which was AFD, I canceled its GA because its discussion was going no where. But later I put AFD articles on hold till their discussion is resolved. I'm mainly reviewing articles related to Films and India since I'm much knowledgeable about them. ASHU^IND 17:02, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

It is important to do reasonable thorough reviews when assessing GAs. We need top make sure they are all up to standard and in many cases the nominators are looking to improve the articles and welcome advice. You might want to look at how some other editors conduct reviews, they are all differ, but most offer ways to improve the article. It will be very rare when an article cannot be improved. Checking through yours I feel they are too brief and all contain almost exactly the same comments. The prose should be understandable, references should be spot checked for accuracy and close paraphrasing, images should be checked for copyright, anything that might be missing noted and the history checked for any recent edit warring. If you have any questions feel free to ask me or to leave a note at Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations. AIRcorn (talk) 10:47, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Saying that I can see no major problems with the articles you have passed and it is good to see new people attacking the backlog. AIRcorn (talk) 10:53, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Yes. I'm actually reviewing those articles who are well elaborated and cited. Since I'm new in reviewing them I do refer to other reviewers techniques. That's why I only passed those article I'm aware of and found no much to say or comment since they only needed check for links. If I find any article written short or need improvement beyond my imagination I'll revert back to you for help as a second opinion. ASHU^IND 12:25, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

No problem AIRcorn (talk) 22:13, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Waiting for your review on Sucker Punch (soundtrack) when you feel like doing it... igordebraga ≠ 13:26, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Re:

Hi. Hope you are fine. Right now, i am not doing anything major because i am having exams. I already have 3 reviews pending but i can help after November 24, 2011 if you want. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 14:03, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Sure.. All the best for your xams :) ASHU^IND 17:41, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Thank you. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫)

Orphaned non-free image File:HaloEvolutionsbookover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HaloEvolutionsbookover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:15, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Edits on Halo: Combat Evolved Anniversary

Why did you edit the page while the GOCEinuse template was posted at the top of the page? I think you should've waited until after I finished to clean up the minor mistakes. Since I'm using Internet Explorer right now, all my changes had been lost. --Sp33dyphil © • © 05:17, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Wait let me see if its in history. Try click back button on IE. Its always there in cache. ASHU^IND 06:10, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

That's the problem, IE doesn't have a cache. I'm using Chrome right now. --Sp33dyphil © • © 07:04, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Merchant Prince II

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Merchant Prince II, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Dennis Brown (talk) 17:36, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Gold status games

Category:Gold status games, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. ferret (talk) 01:28, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Ra.One

Thank you for the tip Ashu. However, I would like to know exactly what happened to the article to make you say so. Are some editors again trying to put Ra.One as a flop, badly reviewed etc.? AnkitBhatt^{Talk to me!!}_LifEnjoy 17:13, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Check the recent changes in your article. Sources were altered. A review process is always going on and your article is currently reviewed by 3 reviewers. Once one reviews and passes a section then another does the same to make sure whether it was right or problem was there. Rapid on going changes will result in failure and reviewers will suggest to renominate again when the article is old enough and editing is stabilized. Although I've put those in review comments but other reviewers are not from India and we all are already suffering from huge backlog. I've called reviewers from other parts of the world to make sure review is unbiased, and since I'm from India, I would be more than happy to see more GA Indian articles. ASHU^IND 17:23, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. You are talking about the 192 crore to 220 crore figure change. I think that's bound to happen as minor updates keep coming up. After all, weekly gross numbers will come. However, since the film is now not in it's strength at theatres, updates will be assuredly minimal and hence not a problem at all with the GAN. Thanks. AnkitBhatt^{Talk to me!!}_LifEnjoy 17:26, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

No problem with that. Just stick to Boxofficemojo. As one can nominate an article for GA it can also be nominated for GAR (removal) after getting a GA. ASHU^IND 17:31, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, I know :(. I have Done the talking bit with the editor who changed the BO figure, though I doubt any immediate effect as the editor is very very new to Wikipedia. And regarding Box Office Mojo, please notice that the foreign total is outdated by 10 days, and hence cannot be used as such. Right now, the best thing will be to leave the BO figure as it is. AnkitBhatt^{Talk to me!!}_LifEnjoy 17:35, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

I'm sorry to waste time, but could you please point out the exact references which are "dead"? I can try to replace them. However, if they are Box Office India links, they may be tough to recover. Cheers! AnkitBhatt^{Talk to me!!}_LifEnjoy 17:21, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Search for the term dead links in you browser with article opened. They are already marked as a superscript [dead link] in references list. ASHU^IND 17:26, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Well, reference 163 is stated as a dead link but it's perfectly fine. Are you sure that the dead link tags are coming by mistake due to malfunctioning of a bot (perhaps)? I am still checking, so I will update in case anything new crops up. AnkitBhatt^{Talk to me!!}_LifEnjoy 17:09, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Well if the link is working then simply remove that dead link note. We use tool to see whether links are working or not and sometime visit the suspicious one personally. This one might have been due to bot. ASHU^IND 17:23, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Bingo! Found two dead links : 66, 136. I have rectified 136 by replacing the old link with the Rotten Tomatoes site. No. 66 may be harder. Once that's done, I guess it'll be another RESOLVED in the GA review. AnkitBhatt^{Talk to me!!}_LifEnjoy 17:35, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Oh sorry. Ref 66 is working perfectly fine. I guess the matter of links is resolved now. In case any other problems exist, please tell me so. Otherwise, I think you ca put up the resolved template in the Links section of the GA review. AnkitBhatt^{Talk to me!!}_LifEnjoy 05:49, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Can you point out the reviews which, in your opinion, are less-known and liable to be removed from the article? Please respond fast, I am unable to work for very long on this article as I have The Dirty Picture and Don 2 on my editing radar. Thanks. AnkitBhatt^{Talk to me!!}_LifEnjoy 14:32, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Don't worry. Be at peace and carry on your work on other articles. Just keep the review page in your talk list. If you see any update you can respond to it, and if we found no problems, you'll get notification about the result of review. ASHU^IND 20:14, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Dude you didn't point out the less-known reviews that I was talking about :D. AnkitBhatt^{Talk to me!!}_LifEnjoy 03:37, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

ASHU, there is only ONE sticking point in the entire GA review, and that concerns the critical reception section. You have not been actively reviewing Ra.One for some time. Please note that you were the first reviewer, and hence there will be no movement on this review unless you post the progress status. I suggest that you post your grievances regarding the critical reception of the film article on the talk page, and then we can arrive at a consensus. However, you lack of response is, to say the least, frustrating. Please clearly enunciate the reviews you have problems with, and we shall all discuss over the issues one by one. In addition, I have completed 95% of the commercial analysis section, and it is now newly expanded with a good deal of content. I suggest that you overview the article once more and give your final judgement. PS: Do not forget about the reviews part. It is most urgent that the review be completed on time, as the GA review process has taken up a hell lot of time and is rapidly approaching the end of seven days. Thank you. AnkitBhatt^{Talk to me!!}_LifEnjoy 09:27, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Corruption Gov

Hello, Ashliveslove, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you worked on, Corruption Gov, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

It helps to explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the Help Desk. Thanks again for contributing! Sparthorse (talk) 15:41, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Corruption Gov for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Corruption Gov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corruption Gov until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sparthorse (talk) 15:49, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Scrapbook

		The Scrapbook Invite
		Hey! It's good to see you! I have deeply cherished your warm friendship with me, and would like to keep a token of our times together in Wikipedia just in case I go out of touch with you. Hence, I cordially invite you to come and join My Scrapbook, a personal effort to keep all Wikipedians together and to promote WikiLove. I hope this invite receives you in hearty health, and that you can take as much pleasure writing on my scrapbook as I take when I remember you. Wishing an undying friendship, and a continued collaboration with you in Wikipedia. Cheerio! This invite is being sent to all those editors who have worked with me previously, and in the process have become great friends. Wishing everyone a great life and lots of WikiLove! My Scrapbook is no official WP page full of rules and regulations. It's just a part of my Wikipedia. To access it, you can go to my user page, open up the editing page for the user page and go to the (absolute) bottom. Feel free to write, post or simply tell me anything you wish, just as a way of remembrance and our friendship. This way, both of us will have something to take back and cherish. AnkitBhattWDF

A strong suggestion...

For future articles, and to avoid premature judgements toward suitability and notability, I strongly urge that you begin your articles in a user workspace... and not in mainspace. All you need do is begin an article as User:Ashliveslove/(article name here), tag the top of the created page with "{{userdraft}}", and begin editing. And as you prgress, please feel free to ask for advice and input. I'd be glad to offer guidence myself and assist in moves of future drafts into mainspace when ready. Certainly a speedy deletion prod is not the friendliest thing, and seems to act contrary to WP:BITE, WP:WIP, WP:IMPERFECT, and WP:DEADLINE... but starting in a draft space sure avoids headaches and drama. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:08, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for your help. Will keep that in mind. ASHU^IND 04:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

You can also add the following code on your user page (or suitable subpage).

<center>[[File:Under construction icon-blue.svg|none|50px|link=]]</center>

<InputBox>
type=create
preload=Template:Article wizard/userpageskeleton
default=
editintro=Wikipedia:Article wizard/Wizard-New edit instructions userdraft
buttonlabel=Create a userspace draft
prefix=Special:Mypage/
width=50
</InputBox>

-- Trevj (talk) 15:17, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanx. Actually I dnt face such problem while working on well known films, but for lesser known ones I have to face such things. ASHU^IND 15:23, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Reverted edits to Maximiles

Hi. I have reverted your edits to Maximiles since the article is a copyright infringement and was tagged for speedy deletion. Adding the tags you added won't speed up the deletion. Sorry about that. —>εϻαdιν ^ΤαΙk _{Ͼδητrιβμτιoης} 15:53, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

No problem with that, I was using AWB so was not able to view the deletion tag. ASHU^IND 15:58, 22 November 2011 (UTC)