User talk:Ashleyjoyce

Welcome!

Hello, Ashleyjoyce, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

The articles you've started, Bowin Cars and Lotus 41, are looking good! Could you please list your reference(s) for all that information? Cheers, Melchoir 08:28, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:W187.gif

employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. -SCEhard T 23:57, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Set n forget

See this deleteion debate to comment on why the article is needed on Wikipedia. I believe it doesn't meet our notability guidelines - however vague they are on brand name products - but feel free to put as case forward. Also, for any questions you have on Wikipedia as a new user, please visit Wikipedia Boot Camp. Harr o5 10:48, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User space

One strategy - and this has plusses and minuses -- is to create articles in your user space, and then move them into Wiki space when they're ready. Even so, I can the person's point about not allowing separate articles for individual products, you can imagine how advertising agencies and companies would love to get articles on their products into Wikipedia.... Perhaps just one long article on the inventor, or if that's too long, perhaps one article on the inventor and one article on all his inventions combined... Herostratus 00:29, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:W200.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:W200.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 23:12, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:W172.gif

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:W172.gif. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. bluemask 19:02, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Xle pic.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Xle pic.gif. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 00:31, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:GE Example0.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:GE Example0.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:04, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:GE tut14.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:GE tut14.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:05, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

re Google SketchUp 3D Text

Hi Ashleyjoyce. I can see that you put a lot of work into this article. However, as an encyclopedia we can't really get into this level of detail, we are specifically WP:NOT a source for how-to manuals. Geez, I hate to do this, but I'm going to have to put this up for deletion, rules are rules. I hope you don't find this discouraging. Lots of editors lose articles this way. Anyway, it has five days to live, in case you want to save the text or if you want to recast it as a shorter, descriptive, article. Herostratus 07:27, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Herostratus: I understand your point about How-to-Manuals. maybe its a bit long. I was trying to make it visual (the reason for so many pictures)... so readers could see how easy it is to create 3D text for google earth. I will recasrt it as a shorter descriptive, article in the next few days. Ashleyjoyce 07:54, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you use the Wikipedia:Image tutorial to downsize how the images are displayed in the article, Wikibooks may be interested (they DO accept how to manuals), but you'd need to release the images under a free license - Wikipedia only (or Wikibooks only) images will get deleted according to our copyright policy. - Mgm|^(talk) 08:38, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Guys: I've taken all your suggestions onboard and have totally rewritten the article and removed the tutorial to the suwiki website with a link to it. I think it works alot better now. Any comments welcome. Ashleyjoyce 00:12, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it's looking better. I do want to warn you, though, that we software programs have to be notable for it to rate an article, which basically means meeting the requirements at WP:SOFTWARE. If not, somebody will probably come along sooner or later and nominate if for deletion. Herostratus 17:44, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Hi ! 1. Can you please send me a link to GE Chess? 2. Would you be so nice and vote in the chess article discussion page (http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Chess)in favor of ichessu.com (first real international chess university) link?

Thanks in advance

Fair use rationale for Image:Bowin chequered flag.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bowin chequered flag.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:13, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:A189.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:A189.gif. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rette tast 22:27, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:3dchart_sle.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:3dchart_sle.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:14, 7 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 06:14, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:A171.gif

I have tagged Image:A171.gif as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. MER-C 12:23, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

W170.gif

I have tagged Image:W170.gif as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 22:47, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:W173.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:W173.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 22:48, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

W175.gif

I have tagged Image:W175.gif as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 22:50, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

W176.gif

I have tagged Image:W176.gif as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 22:50, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

W181.gif

I have tagged Image:W181.gif as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 22:51, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

W187.gif

I have tagged Image:W187.gif as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 22:51, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

W188.gif

I have tagged Image:W188.gif as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 22:51, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Set and forget.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Set and forget.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 08:05, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Set and forget2.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Set and forget2.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 08:05, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sle pic.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Sle pic.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:41, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Lb90_pic.gif

I have tagged Image:Lb90_pic.gif as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 14:13, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:W109.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:W109.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:22, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:W110.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:W110.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:23, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:W111.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:W111.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:23, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pic_pf.gif

I have tagged Image:Pic_pf.gif as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rettetast (talk) 15:40, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Bowin Koala

I have nominated Bowin Koala, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bowin Koala. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:34, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bowin Koala during 1963 FJ Trophy Cup.gif

Can you please clarify the source and authorship of this image? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:24, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Bowin Koala during 1963 FJ Trophy Cup 2.gif

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bowin Koala during 1963 FJ Trophy Cup 2.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Possibly unfree File:Bowin Koala during 1963 FJ Trophy Cup.gif

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bowin Koala during 1963 FJ Trophy Cup.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Possibly unfree File:Bowin Koala during 1963 FJ Trophy Cup 3.gif

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bowin Koala during 1963 FJ Trophy Cup 3.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Possibly unfree File:Bowin P4 Formula Ford.gif

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bowin P4 Formula Ford.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

AfD nomination of Bowin Technology

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Bowin Technology. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bowin Technology. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Bowin-logo.gif

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bowin-logo.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Call me! ^{My master!} 21:08, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bowin-cars.gif listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bowin-cars.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Call me! ^{My master!} 21:08, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bowin P6

The article Bowin P6 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable details of a car, not written encyclopedically; no refs to back them up either.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Call me! ^{My master!} 21:10, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bowin P8

The article Bowin P8 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable details of a car, not written encyclopedically; no refs to back them up either.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Call me! ^{My master!} 21:10, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bowin P4

The article Bowin P4 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable details of a car, not written encyclopedically; no refs to back them up either.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Call me! ^{My master!} 21:11, 11 October 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by TCNSV (talk • contribs) [reply]

File:Bowin Lotus 46 Europa.gif listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bowin Lotus 46 Europa.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Call me! ^{My master!} 21:12, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:John Joyce.gif listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:John Joyce.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Call me! ^{My master!} 21:16, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:GE tut14.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:GE tut14.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Call me! ^{My master!} 21:19, 11 October 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by TCNSV (talk • contribs) [reply]

Proposed deletion of Set-n-Forget cooker

The article Set-n-Forget cooker has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Having technical data and little details make it seem promotional, added to the fact that there are no references to back up this material.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Call me! ^{My master!} 21:23, 11 October 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by TCNSV (talk • contribs) [reply]

Proposed deletion of Lotus 41

The article Lotus 41 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Excessive trivia, little actual content, no references.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Call me! ^{My master!} 21:26, 11 October 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by TCNSV (talk • contribs) [reply]

Proposed deletion of Bowin P3

The article Bowin P3 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable details of a car, not written encyclopedically; little to no refs to back them up either.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Call me! ^{My master!} 21:27, 11 October 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by TCNSV (talk • contribs) [reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Bowin-cars2.gif or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:06, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Set-n-Forget cooker for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Set-n-Forget cooker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Set-n-Forget cooker until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:43, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]