User talk:Ashley.stein.27

A page you started (Record Nations) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Record Nations, Ashley.stein.27!

Wikipedia editor WebCite just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Hello, Wikipedian. This message is to let you know the article you recently created has been reviewed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment on WebCite's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A page you started (Shred Nations) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Shred Nations, Ashley.stein.27!

Wikipedia editor WebCite just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Hello, Wikipedian. This message is to let you know the article you recently created has been reviewed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment on WebCite's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Speedy deletion nomination of Record Nations[edit]

Hello Ashley.stein.27,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Record Nations for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Jbh ^Talk 15:37, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ashley.stein.27, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Ashley.stein.27! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Samwalton9 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Notability[edit]

Ashley, the problem with the Record Nations page is not the sentence you just removed linking to associated companies. That was fine, the problem is the language of the page. Even if that is fixed, there may still be notability issues here which can ultimately lead to the page's deletion. See WP:42 for a short summary of our criteria for inclusion. Shred Nations may have similar problems.

Additionally, if you are associated with these organisations you should read our conflict of interest guideline. If you are paid by any of these organisations then you should also read our paid editing guideline. Compliance with this is mandatory, it is part of our terms of use. SpinningSpark 18:03, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ashley.stein.27. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you.Deb (talk) 18:52, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shred Nations[edit]

The article Shred Nations has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Insufficient coverage in reliable sources to pass the notability guideline for companies or the general notability guideline.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joe Roe (talk) 21:52, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shred Nations for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shred Nations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shred Nations until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. David Biddulph (talk) 21:05, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Ashley.stein.27, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:31, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Ashley.stein.27. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Shred Nations, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Joe Roe (talk) 01:52, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]