User talk:Ashbalalr

Photos and Photo-credits

Please note we do NOT give photocredits on Wikipedia - the credit is on the images page at Commons. Furthermore, you should not be promoting your photos by replacing an existing image with it, as you have a clear Conflict of interest - Thanks - Arjayay (talk) 17:47, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, the image is not your work it is a copyright violation from here or another source, and has been nominated for deletion - as have your other uploads. - Arjayay (talk) 17:58, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nivin Pauly. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 18:18, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nivin Pauly, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 11:21, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Misplaced article

I noticed that you began to write an article at Help talk:Permanent link. I have undone your edit there, because that page is for discussing improvements to one of the help pages. It is not a good place to submit content for the encyclopedia. I suggest that you look at Wikipedia:Your first article and perhaps try again using the Article wizard. -- John of Reading (talk) 08:48, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ashbal Razeen

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ashbal Razeen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. John of Reading (talk) 08:52, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Ashbal Razeen, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:09, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Ashbal Razeen. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:16, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Ashbal Razeen, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 12:18, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion. Shellwood (talk) 12:27, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I want to recover my account Ashbalalr (talk) 15:40, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 12:44, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Ashbalalr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #18917 was submitted on Aug 04, 2017 13:57:09. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 13:57, 4 August 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Ashbalalr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #18918 was submitted on Aug 04, 2017 15:18:18. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 15:18, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

My account is blocked Ashbalalr (talk) 15:39, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Correct. If you wish to appeal follow the instructions in the orange block notice, above. Just Chilling (talk) 16:16, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]