User talk:AshOrchid2254
| This user is a student editor in Western_Washington_University/History_of_Ancient_Greece_(Fall_Quarter) . |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, AshOrchid2254, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:16, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Peer Review
[edit]Lead Section The lead section of this article is good. It provides a brief overview of the topic as well as what is covered in the article. I know you haven't edited/rearranged The main body of what is already provided in the article so there's not much I can say to this point. Clarity of Article Structure The sections are organized well and they pass from topic to topic in a sensible manner. The Ahhiyawa Texts section felt like it may be wedged in the middle of the more broader and general duties of Wanaxes so perhaps it could be moved to the end or another section. Coverage balance The coverage balance is good. Topics such as economic participation seem to be appropriately longer given the variety of sources drawn upon which cover it. I feel this is a very professional representation of the sources as many topics are represented evenly throughout the sections. Comparatively, the Homeric Anax section which is a part of the original article may be difficult due to its scarcity in sources. Content Neutrality The neutrality and professionalism of this draft is astounding. Reading the sandbox I felt as if I was reading an actual serious Wikipedia article or professional abstract. Language is incredibly neutral and devoid of anything but facts which are promptly cited by sources, often times multiple which back up the content. Exploring the sources, I found that the additional content created by the user added a valuable extension to article seeing how relevant the term is in Mycenean Greece. Sources Many sources are used heavily in the additions to the article which may be considered detrimental. However, I believe the thorough citations add reliability in finding where these statements are taken from is a beneficial factor. The tone of the article does not present the information in a way which could be viewed as one sided as the article is an amazing synthesis of many different sources sometimes in the same sentence.