User talk:Arzoomrn
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
Suggestion for Your query
[edit]No approval needed to edit an article or write new article. You can simply click on the edit button and start the modification you want. Please remember in Wikipedia only well referenced information are kept.Don't get disappointed ask me if you have any query I can guide you step by step. You can also ask in the Help page. If you want to read more on how can you write an biographic article then please see this page. There are people always ready to help you don't worry. Simple steps to create an biographic article is
- Search the name of the person you want to add
- If you find them then no need to create one but you can add more information to it.
- If you don't find someone with that name you can simply create the article
- Click on create and Write about the person you can refer some other person to see the styling
- After writing some information you should give some reference {remember reference is a must)for adding reference and styling you can use the editor's toolbar. Please clicl one by one and see so that you can learn.
- Click on preview to see how is your article looks like.
- if everything is ok then then you can save the article.
Just do it now and if you get any problem write on my talk or see me on facebook. I'm always there to help you. You can be an expert editor in few days.Thank You--Jnanaranjan Sahu (ଜ୍ଞାନ) talk 13:46, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
No problem ! You can Proceed further. Make the article live .I've a doubt regrading the image. Else the article seems good --Jnanaranjan Sahu (ଜ୍ଞାନ) talk 06:03, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Dear Jnanaranjan Sahu (ଜ୍ଞାନ) I am done with the write-up now please let me know how to get approval. Truly I am zero in all such things and invested great energy on it.--Arzoomrn (talk) 06:33, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Ok now Search the name of the Name i.e Malik Muhammad Jahangir on wikipedia and you'll not find it then on the search result pag eyou'll see some suggestion but on the top of the result you will see that the name is written in red and wikipedia encourages yo to create an article on that name.just click on red link and copy paste the whole thing from your sandbox content. You are done.--Jnanaranjan Sahu (ଜ୍ଞାନ) talk 06:55, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Dear Jnanaranjan Sahu (ଜ୍ଞାନ) please check it now.Please also help me in citation.I am counting on finger.waiting impatiently --Arzoomrn (talk) 07:42, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Congratulations your article Malik Muhammad Jahangir is on Wikipedia. You have done all things right and don't worry about the citation issues you have added enough citations. Thanks--Jnanaranjan Sahu (ଜ୍ଞାନ) talk 09:43, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Dear Jnanaranjan Sahu (ଜ୍ଞାନ) thanks so nice of you. Could i Find this piece on google now? I also need your support. Dropping you a message on FB.--Arzoomrn (talk) 10:42, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Google takes time to scrawl pages .Since this article is on Wikipedia this will be on Google soon. keep patience.--Jnanaranjan Sahu (ଜ୍ଞାନ) talk 10:47, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Dear Jnanaranjan Sahu (ଜ୍ଞାନ) u there? What should I do? I am not getting whats happening.....they asked me to change Id so I did and now again it happened.Fr three months I tried to understand how to write and now I am not getting what wikipedia wants out of me....for me lots of policies and many are violating...plz guide me....I have a feel that has discriminatory policy since many of the businessmen have their profiles who are not doing anything...and my well reference write up have lots of objections.plz suggest what should I do now.
Arzoomrn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I promise I abide by wiki rules in coming future
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. - Vianello (Talk) 22:26, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Truly speaking it was not promotional act. I am zero in handling or understanding that how to change username thats why I committed mistake. I can only write.please dear all allow me one chance--Arzoomrn (talk) 18:09, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Whitepearl1 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here. ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mark Arsten (talk) 05:28, 21 February 2014 (UTC) |