User talk:Aryashahnaughty
Speedy deletion nomination of Aryashahnaughty
[edit]Hello, Aryashahnaughty,
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Mydreamsparrow and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, Aryashahnaughty, for deletion, because it's impossible to identify the subject of the article.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.
For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Mydreamsparrow}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
DreamSparrow Chat 10:39, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
I Would Not This Delete Page aryashah 13:48, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Arya Shah
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Arya Shah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kb03 (talk) 13:12, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
October 2019
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 13:53, 4 October 2019 (UTC)UTRS 38136
[edit]UTRS appeal #38136 has been declined. User is globally locked. User is banned from UTRS for six months. Please see below.
I'm sorry but I cannot unblock you. You have repeatedly used Wikipedia for self promotion, across multiple Wiki's. Because of this cross-wiki abuse, you are globally locked. You will not be unblocked to edit about yourself. You will need to tell us what constructive edits you will make.
Despite being told the foregoing many times, you have not acted accordingly. This raises an issue of WP:CIR. You will need to convince someone somewhere that you have the competence to constructively edit an encyclopedia. Because of your failure to demonstarate understanding that Wikipedia is not for self promotion, and your failure to tell us what constructive edits you would make, you are banned from UTRS for six months. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:35, 5 December 2020 (UTC)Sockpuppet investigation
[edit]
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aryashahnaughty, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Tommi1986 let's talk! 11:22, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.