User talk:Aryanprince

Welcome!

Hello, Aryanprince, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Disruptive editing

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Serbs, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.--Zoupan 17:47, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I repeat for the last time, do not repeat your disruptive editing. That data is present in Genetic studies on Serbs, which is linked in the ethnography section. The various theories on the ethnonym is present at Names of Serbs and Serbia, which is, again, linked in that section.--Zoupan 23:25, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Zoupan 02:21, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:41, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Balkans, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Further notice: You have been engaging in disruptive tendentious editing at Serbs. If you continue, you will very likely be banned from the topic area. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:52, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Future Perfect at Sunrise: He continues.--Zoupan 20:44, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Serbs, you may be blocked from editing. --Zoupan 22:45, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Your recent editing history at Serbs shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Thomas.W ^talk 19:10, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Topic ban

Because of your ongoing edit-warring on Serbs you are now topic-banned from making any edits related to Serbs or Serbia, in either discussions or article edits, for a period of 6 months. This will be logged under WP:AC/DSL according to the discretionary sanctions rule referenced above. Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:27, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Future Perfect at Sunrise: breached.--Zoupan 05:50, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aryanprince, you have been blocked for 1 week for breach of your topic ban. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:29, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Snow

Hello, I'm Barek. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Snow, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 17:45, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA reassessment for Snow

Snow, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. User:HopsonRoad 13:52, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]