User talk:Aryamahasattva
Mitanni page info
[edit]Source can only be used to support text they explicitly support. The language family tree has nothing to say about the social status of these speaking the language, as such does not support the claim they were nobles. The Petrie source is talking about Ankenhaten, not Mtittani nobility. Saying a sources says something it does not is violation of policy, please stop or provide a direct quote from source supporting your text.Slatersteven (talk) 22:12, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
Please explain on the article talk page what your specific objection is to the expansion of the lead. The third paragraph has nothing to do with the dispute for which Nyisnotbad was blocked from editing. There is no reason to revert it. Likewise, addition in the second paragraph of mention of isoglosses is nothing more than a summary of what exists in the text of the article - which itself needs further expansion. Your wholesale reversion is unjustified, and I strongly object to your accusation of bad faith on my part in your edit summary. Reversions made without discussion can be viewed as edit warring and be subject to administrative sanctions. Please discuss your specific concerns on the talk page.μηδείς (talk) 19:48, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
Please discuss your proposed edits on the talk page of the article. You may have valid concerns, but your recent reversions have been problematic as inaccurate and promoting a POV. This can be avoided by suggesting an edit on the talk page for reactions first. I formally warn you not to violate WP:3RR.μηδείς (talk) 17:00, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Armenians
[edit]The section on Azerbaijan which you delete from this article has been agreed on by both parties on the discussion page.
P.S. Call me vandal one more time, and you will be reported for incivility. Parishan (talk) 16:21, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
victory stele o naram sin
[edit]I hate to revert what looks like a good faith effort, but I have been unable to find any reference on line to armenians in connection to the Naram-Sin Victory Stele. I am going to tag it for now to give you time to add a source.μηδείς (talk) 19:54, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
You need to follow wikipedia policy on this. You have not provided a scholarly source for the claim. You cannot cite another wikipedia article as a reference - and I will get around to correcting that article based on the source. I have played nice with you here, tagging the article for a source, and trying to find one myself. The only references are fringe wikis. At this point you are engaging in edit warring and you will be reported for violating wp:3rr with another revert. Find a good source and put it on the talk page and we can proceed from there.μηδείς (talk) 23:28, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
edit warring
[edit]By aware that it does not require a violation of WP:3RR to constitute edit warring.μηδείς (talk) 04:21, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
Notification
[edit] The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose, at their own discretion, sanctions on any editor working on pages broadly related to Armenia-Azerbaijan and related conflicts if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2#Final decision. The slow moving edit war on Armenian language is still disruptive. Courcelles 04:58, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
notification AN3 complaint
[edit]A formal complaint has been filed against you here for edit warring. μηδείς (talk) 06:07, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
You are limited to one revert per day on all articles related to Armenia and Azerbaijan
[edit]Please see the result of WP:AN3#User:Aryamahasattva reported by User:Medeis (Result: 1RR imposed per WP:ARBAA2). The 1RR will expire on 17 November, 2011. This restriction may be appealed to me, to WP:Arbitration enforcement or to Arbcom directly. Blocks may be issued by any admin for a violation of a 1RR. Individual admins are permitted to enact these restrictions per Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2#Amended Remedies and Enforcement. The restriction is being logged at WP:ARBAA2#Log of blocks and bans. EdJohnston (talk) 18:11, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
November 2010
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The following two reverts by you at Template:History of Armenia are less than 24 hours apart, so they violate your 1RR restriction which was imposed under WP:ARBAA2. (See above for details).
If you will agree to follow the 1RR restriction in the future, this block could be lifted. EdJohnston (talk) 23:07, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
FYI
[edit]See discussion. AgadaUrbanit (talk) 23:11, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
Warning on logging in
[edit]Hi. Going forward, pleas remember to log in when you want to edit. Editing while logged out from multiple IPs as a way of evading scrutiny or edit warring is not allowed and may result in you being blocked from editing. Thanks. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 12:55, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
- It has been suggested that IPs might relate to User:Ararat arev, banned for 3RR, block evasion and sockpuppetry, the IP addresses come from the same area as the IP addresses listed in the block log - the Los Angeles area - and his field of interests (Armenian nationalist issues) is the same.
- See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Ararat_arev/Archive
- See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Ararat arev and it appears 76.237.11.236 matches 76.237.11.*
- AgadaUrbanit (talk) 19:03, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
April 2011
[edit]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Urartian language. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.
In particular, the three-revert rule states that:
- Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dougweller (talk) 05:00, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
ANI discussion
[edit]I should have blocked you earlier but as I've reverted you I'm involved. You're in violation of your 1RR description and I've raised this at Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.. Dougweller (talk) 05:08, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. AnomieBOT⚡ 06:21, 26 April 2011 (UTC)Kingpin13 (talk) 05:28, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
File:ArmenianDance.jpg needs authorship information
[edit]
The media file you uploaded as File:ArmenianDance.jpg appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.
It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.
Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).
- If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which:
{{subst:usernameexpand|Aryamahasattva}}will produce an appropriate expansion,
or use the {{own}} template.
- If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.