User talk:Artoasis/Archive 5
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Artoasis. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Dylan edits
No. I think "His recordings with drums electric bass and guitar instrument resulted in controversy and criticism from some in the folk movement who earlier had denounced Dylan for writing more personal songs and no longer writing political songs." is horrible writing.
The last version I thought was OK was: " Leaving his initial base in the culture of folk music behind, Dylan revolutionized perceptions of the limits of popular music in 1965 with the six-minute single "Like a Rolling Stone".[5] His recordings backed by rock musicians attracted denunciation and criticism from others in the folk movement."
The Artist changed it to the current version with the strange comment: ("rock musicians", a lot of them would have pulled a knife on anyone who called them that - added germane context soorly missing from lead)
Please turn current version into something more literate & less horrible. I just made one edit, taking an earlier part of the first para back to a version I though was better, and which had been there for ages. I'm waiting to find out if The Artist changes that. I left 2 polite messages on his Talk page, suggesting ways we could reach consensus, but he just deleted them. Best wishes Mick gold (talk) 18:52, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
- I would prefer "His recordings backed by rock musicians attracted denunciation and criticism from others in the folk movement." to "However, his recordings employing electric instruments attracted denunciation and criticism from others in the folk movement." Surely the significance of LARS and the H61R album was that they transformed Dylan into a major figure in rock culture in 1965. Mick gold (talk) 19:27, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello, Artoasis. There's currently a dispute at the above named article, which you've worked on in the past. If you can find the time, I would appreciate it if you could comment on matters on the talk page. Cheers. Polisher of Cobwebs (talk) 19:53, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Thank You!
Thank you for your recent assistance in assessing articles for WikiProject Biography. In the past couple of months, I have become one of the few Wikipedians to actively continue checking the assessment request list, and any assistance is greatly appreciated especially since about half of the requests currently pending on that list are older ones that I submitted. --TommyBoy (talk) 14:49, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
WikiProject Film's January–February Newsletter
The January 2012 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
To unsubscribe, please remove your name from the distribution list. GRAPPLE X 00:35, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Six hours ninety nine minutes. Yeaaaaah ! Good boy... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.124.159.19 (talk) 19:39, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
WikiProject Biography Assessment Help Needed
As one of the few Wikipedians to continue actively checking the WikiProject Biography assessment requests page, I would like to request your assistance in resolving a dispute I am having with User:Highschoolpuppettier regarding my determination that the La Digue article is not within the scope of WikiProject Biography. Despite my removal of the article from the assessment requests list and subsequent explanation of my reasons for that action on his UserTalk page, he has re-submitted the article for assessment by WikiProject Biography. Any assistance you can provide in resolving this matter, and in reviewing other assessment requests pending on the WikiProject Biography page would be most appreciated. --TommyBoy (talk) 09:12, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
- Following up on my previous comments, the issue regarding the La Digue article assessment has been resolved. --TommyBoy (talk) 07:51, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
I wonder...
if you looked at the edit summaries. And why you gotta use my Talk page, and not the Talk page of the relevant article. Weird. The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous (talk) 08:26, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
Burden
can't you Google? And the burden is on the restorer. The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous (talk) 17:05, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
Use of derviative works templates
As the leading editor in terms of edit count of {{Great Expectations}}, I am alerting you to the discussion about the use of derivative works templates in author bio articles at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Novels#Derivative works and cultural references templates. We are discussing whether they should be removed from or collapsed or left alone in the author's articles.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 23:46, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Awards lists in play articles
Based on your past editing activity, you may want to comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Theatre#Award enumeration.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:09, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
emily mortimer
Yo soy nuevo en este wikipedia,no entiendo mucho. creo que hay cambiar las fotos actuales de emily. hace poco cambie pero dice que va a sacar. si te gusta las mismas fotos, esta bien. espero que me respondas ArthurDelarte (talk | contribs) 04:44, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Artoasis. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)