User talk:Artlatinlover

Welcome!

Hello, Artlatinlover, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! RJFJR (talk) 23:40, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Please do not use Wikipedia to promote businesses, such as you did in the article Molise. Wikipedia is not the Yellow pages. If you want to list a company for potential customers to find, please consider alternative outlets. Thank you. Alex2006 (talk) 06:19, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, there was no intention to promote any company. I just mentioned cultural activities related to Latin, Ancient Greek and Art. I believe there is more culture in Molise than just food. If you think the company I was promoting was the Cultural Association Leonardo, I can just insert the three cultural activities related to Latin, Ancient Greek and Art with no mention of the Cultural Association. Please let me know if this is fine for you Artlatinlover (talk) 07:37, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, and thanks for writing. The template used for the revert is misleading, mentioning only commercial activities. In reality, the wikipedia policy which explicitly forbides such edits is WP:PROMOTION: in a nutshell, it says that each kind of promotion is prohibited. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and as such it has the same standard as a paper encyclopedia: and your edit for sure would not find its place on the Molise or Boiano voices on the Britannica (or Treccani) Encyclopedias. Maybe you could write a voice about your project, but then the project itself must fulfill the test of Notability. Alex2006 (talk) 05:42, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

The subject of this draft is not clear. It starts with a statement about software, then it discusses corporate art and then it goes on to a manifesto. Please decide what you want to write about then stick to the topic. Try to integrate the different aspects into a coherent whole.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Artlatinlover/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:24, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Artlatinlover, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:24, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: PptArt (August 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:PptArt and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 09:35, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Artlatinlover, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 09:35, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:PptArt concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:PptArt, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:PptArt

Hello, Artlatinlover. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "PptArt".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 12:01, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of PptArt

The article PptArt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This and Corporate Art Awards are full of COI promo editing. They are redundant pages. At the very least this one should go. Doesn't pass CORPDEPTH or GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Theredproject (talk) 22:10, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with your comment. The Corporate Art Awards article is redundant to pptArt so it makes sense to merge them. Feel free to do it as I am not familiar with the "merge" function. However I find that pptArt is mentioned in several international press articles and publications and has notable projects with the United Nations, Italian Ministry of Culture, Italian President of the Republic, etc.) Artlatinlover (talk) 22:56, 21 March 2018 (UTC)Artlatinlover Artlatinlover (talk) 22:46, 21 March 2018 (UTC)Artlatinlover[reply]

Proposed deletion of Onomata Kechiasmena

The article Onomata Kechiasmena has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The sources don't add up on this one. They are for the Hebdomada Aenigmatum latin one, which is pretty borderline as is, but the greek one doesn't cut it. I think both of them should go, but we will start here.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Theredproject (talk) 22:12, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with your comment. The Onomata Kechiasmena article is somewhat redundant to Hebdomada Aenigmatum so it makes sense to merge them. Feel free to do it as I am not familiar with the "merge" function. On the other side, Hebdomada Aenigmatum is a free Latin magazine which is mentioned in several international press articles (BBC, The Times, etc.), it is used in schools and universities. Artlatinlover (talk) 22:46, 21 March 2018 (UTC)Artlatinlover[reply]