User talk:Artipol

Mediation

The mediation discussion is beginning at Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Dedicated video game consoles. Please go there and state your case. --דניאל - Danielrocks123 ^contribs 21:58, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of emulators

Thanks for the clarification. However, a simple answer on the talk page would have been more polite. talk pages are for discussion, not for other people to remove arbitrary entries... --Darkstar 13:55, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Applet

I posted a couple comment under Talk:Applet concerning your revert of my revert of the introductory paragraph of Applet. Please respond if you want to make additional changes. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by AdamMorton (talk • contribs) 05:41, 9 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Warnings

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policy for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Thank you. [1] [2]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:List of emulators, you will be blocked from editing. There are two cases [3] [4] of talk page blanking in a deceptive manner. You also reverted [5] a linkfarm on the List of emulators article. An editor spent a lot of time cleaning up the links on that page.

The mediation, blankings, vandalism, and revertings all look like a feud to me. Who is James Jacobs? Can you please tell me what is going on? (Requestion 22:26, 28 April 2007 (UTC))[reply]

I have added the {{cleanup-spam}} tag to the List of emulators article. Since you reverted [6] a different spam fighters work it is now your responsibility to clean up this mess. I would like you remove all of the external links in that article. I will strikeout the above warnings on the completion of this community service. Thank you. (Requestion 22:47, 28 April 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Power Drome

Please stop turning the article into an article about a game by Electronic Arts. If there is another game with the same name we give it another name so both games have articles. One doesn't get priority over the other. I will create a separate article for the Electronic Arts game so that both games can co-exist, it will be Powerdrome and the other will be Power Drome. Xtreme racer 23:11, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thank you. Artipol 06:59, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your changes to article Sprite (computer graphics)

You made what I would consider a significant change to the article Sprite (computer graphics) but did not leave a comment on the talk page explaining your changes or make any citations to back up your changes. I'm reverting your changes for now, but if I have done this in error, please let me know where you got the information that would back up the changes. --Zidane2k1 16:09, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The capabilities of the 2636 chip are described in its official datasheet. See the relevant articles for details about the machines using this chip. Artipol 08:25, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of CodeWar

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article CodeWar, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Can't see the notability of this subject.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Victor Lopes (talk) 18:25, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]