User talk:Artiomjar

Orphaned non-free image File:Screenshot of windows installer clean up.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Screenshot of windows installer clean up.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:47, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

mortality

Not sure why you are adding an empty section to Mobile phone radiation and health. Feel free to add new sections but they need content and references. Bhny (talk) 17:56, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Mobile phone radiation and health, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. sciencewatcher (talk) 18:06, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or improperly sourced content, as you did to Mobile phone radiation and health. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. Also see WP:MEDRS. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. sciencewatcher (talk) 16:22, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on Mobile phone radiation and health. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.

Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jc3s5h (talk) 17:44, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Mobile phone radiation and health

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Mobile phone radiation and health. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The complete report of this case is at WP:AN3#User:Artiomjar reported by User:Jc3s5h (Result: 24h). EdJohnston (talk) 20:37, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm Kmg90. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Talk:Sensation seeking, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kmg90 (talk) 14:43, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Psychedelic experience. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. DVdm (talk) 22:05, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note - As I said in the edit summary of my previous revert: "Citation needed" does not mean to add even more unsourced content. - DVdm (talk) 22:14, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Psychedelic experience. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DVdm (talk) 10:20, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]