User talk:Arthurfan828

My pics are my own work taken from our family album. Please deleting my work and contributions because they're not owned by anyone but me. I took the photos also of most of the pics (Gcqrama8 (talk) 00:55, 18 August 2019 (UTC))[reply]

That’s not how licensing works. See Wikipedia:Image use policy. Arthurfan828 (talk) 00:57, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of ROBLOX games

The article List of ROBLOX games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable games.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 00:43, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of ROBLOX games moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of ROBLOX games, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 01:06, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:List of ROBLOX games

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:List of ROBLOX games, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 19:42, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bubble Guppies (season 5)

The article Bubble Guppies (season 5) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The subject of this article does not pass Wikipedia's general notability guideline. I found routine coverage that mentions the season in passing ([1][2]) and blog coverage ([3]), but no significant coverage in reliable sources. The article does not have any incoming links and there aren't articles for any of the previous season (Bubble Guppies (season 1), etc.), so I don't think redirecting would be advisable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 22:35, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NeilNeil. To clarify, sources like this don't establish the season's notability because they a) are routine coverage and b) don't include in-depth discussion about the season—the specific guidelines about this are WP:ROUTINE and WP:SIGCOV. Let me know if you have any questions or if you find additional sources. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 22:48, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh ok Arthurfan828 (talk) 20:00, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Hello, I'm Magitroopa. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to The SpongeBob Movie: It's a Wonderful Sponge have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 20:25, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh ok I fully understand my notice/reminder Arthurfan828 (talk) 20:27, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Your recent talk page comments on Talk:List of Martha Speaks episodes were not added to the bottom of the page. New discussion page messages and topics should always be added to the bottom. Your message may have been moved. In the future you can use the "New section" link in the top right. For more details see the talk page guidelines. Thank you. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 06:41, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Arthurfan828. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 20:44, 10 August 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peppa Pig (character) (August 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at List of Peppa Pig characters. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No separate notability for this character from the show.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Peppa Pig (character) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Peppa Pig (character), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:14, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Arthurfan828! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:14, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Peppa Pig (character).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Peppa Pig (character).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:36, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peppa Pig (character) (August 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Whispering was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at List of Peppa Pig characters. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Peppa Pig (character) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Peppa Pig (character), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Whispering^(t) 13:21, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:BubbleGuppiesFanBoiRoblox.png

A tag has been placed on File:BubbleGuppiesFanBoiRoblox.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TheAwesome Hwyh 00:08, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not how Non-free content works

FYI- you can't use non-free content on userpages. Sorry. TheAwesome Hwyh 00:46, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:BubbleGuppiesFanBoiRoblox.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BubbleGuppiesFanBoiRoblox.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. TheAwesome Hwyh 01:53, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Arthurfan828! You created a thread called ? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BubbleGuppiesFanBoiRoblox.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BubbleGuppiesFanBoiRoblox.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:IPadmini4screenshot.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:IPadmini4screenshot.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vilam (watch company)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vilam (watch company) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mcampany (talk) 21:36, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Arthurfan828. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 23:01, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arthurfan828 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

First of all, I didn’t vandalize on this account. Yes, I did create the CallMeBlonde, CaillouFan, BubbleGuppiesIsTheBest and more accounts. I saw the block for sock puppetry notice 2 months ago, so, I edited Wikipedia on CaillouFan account. However, I saw the block notice on my userpage yesterday night. Why did I make sockpuppet accounts? Well, when I created CallMeBlonde it got blocked almost a year ago for vandalism. However, I thought my edits on that account were helpful. So, I created BubbleGuppiesIsTheBest account (which got blocked this year). It got blocked for being rude to a user because of a source. I thought to myself lesson learned, never be rude to anybody, and promised not to do it again when I created this account. After that one got blocked, I used this account I created a year ago and when it got blocked, I moved on to CaillouFan. I did request to get myself blocked because I just needed a break from Wikipedia. Around, 20 minutes later, I saw the block screen. This is why I want to get unblocked please. I just miss Wikipedia. Thank you.

Decline reason:

This entire unblock request just explains how you violated WP:SOCK and serves to reinforce the decision to block you in the first place. Your only option at this point to to abide by the standard offer which includes the requirement that you don't edit at all, from any account or IP, for at least six months.Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:45, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Replaceable fair use File:IPadmini5(2019).jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:IPadmini5(2019).jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ViperSnake151 Talk 23:19, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Bubble Guppies (Nintendo DS game) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Bubble Guppies (Nintendo DS game), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Peppa Pig (character) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Peppa Pig (character), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bubble Guppies (Nintendo DS game)

Hello, Arthurfan828. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bubble Guppies".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:41, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Peppa Pig (character)

Hello, Arthurfan828. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Peppa Pig".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:02, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS 30111 Aug 11, 2020. checkuser block. has TPA

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Arthurfan828 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #30111 was submitted on 2020-04-16 20:21:10. This review is now closed.

User is not eligible for unblock consideration until Aug. 11, 2020. As this is a checkuser block, user should review that part of the WP:GAB. As user has access to their talk page, it would be best to post further unblock requests here. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 02:17, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User is again reminded to not edit Wikipedia at all, with any account or IP address, until Aug 11, 2020. And then only if they wish to request unblock. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 02:23, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]