Jump to content

User talk:Artemisia5!

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Louis René Boulanger moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Louis René Boulanger, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 23:04, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Louis René Boulanger has been accepted

[edit]
Louis René Boulanger, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 17:39, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Frances Farrand Dodge moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Frances Farrand Dodge, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 15:25, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frances Farrand Dodge has been accepted

[edit]
Frances Farrand Dodge, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:59, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Lucie Dadat

[edit]

Hello, Artemisia5!,

Thank you for creating Lucie Dadat.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This page needs references and citations to survive on this wikipedia. If not, the page faces deletion - en-rapide.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 10:40, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Citations and notes

[edit]

Hello! I noticed in a couple of the articles you created (Lucie Dadat and Frances Farrand Dodge) that there are some problems with sourcing. They are not the usual source problems; you actually include many sources! But they are often disconnected form the facts. It seems like you have done some terrific research to find so many specific sources for each subject. But when you explain a claim with a footnote and don't include the source in that note, it doesn't matter because it cannot be traced back to the source and verified. Does that make sense? The best practice is to always use cite web or cite book inline with the claim, so the claim and the source are directly connected. You are making some really interesting articles, thanks. --- Possibly (talk) 10:43, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Artemisia5!. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Paul de Chestret de Haneffe, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:03, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]