User talk:Art to Tech

I look forward to seeing a message or two here...

Welcome Art to Tech!

Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 48,315,833 registered editors!

Hello, Art to Tech. Welcome to Wikipedia!

I'm S0091, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

To help get you started, you may find these useful:

The Five Pillars (fundamental principles) of Wikipedia

A Primer for Newcomers

Introduction to Wikipedia

Wikipedia Training Modules

Simplified Manual of Style

Creating a new article via the Article Wizard

When editing, follow the 3 Core Content Policies:

1. Neutral point of view: represent significant views fairly

2. Verifiability: claims should cite reliable, published sources

3. No original research: no originality; reference published sources

Brochures: Editing Wikipedia & Illustrating Wikipedia
Ask a Question about How to Use Wikipedia
Help

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.

Sincerely, S0091 (talk) 16:15, 12 September 2020 (UTC) (Leave me a message)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Red House on Mississippi (December 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NBUILDING. The Redhouseonmississippi website is a primary source and therefore not independent or reliable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Red House on Mississippi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Red House on Mississippi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 08:38, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Art to Tech! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 08:38, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

News On Wiki check-in

Hi there! Thank you for your interest in our campaign to improve the public's knowledge about local newspapers. Time has flown since we got going in September, and our six month campaign ends in just a month! We'd like to check in with you about work you have done, or any articles you'd like to write or edit to do before we wrap up.

We published a mid-campaign report, highlighting strong work from several Wikipedia editors (both new wiki folks and veterans); contributions from Kristy Roschke's journalism course at Arizona State University; and strong engagement from groups like AfroCROWD and Wikimedians of the Caribbean.

As we begin our final push, we would love to learn what you have been working on, or help you with any challenges. We're hosting several informal video conference sessions in the next week. (If that format is no good for you, just let us know.) We'd love to hear what newspapers have caught your interest, any articles you've already written, and also any kind of support you could use in writing up newspapers that lack Wikipedia entries. We'll focus especially on newspapers of the Caribbean in our final month, as we continue to work on Black-owned U.S. newspapers, and newspapers of Washington State. Please register for one of these Zoom meetings. If these times don't work for you, or if you hate Zoom, etc., just reply here (please include the text "[[User:Peteforsyth]] and [[User:Shanluan]]" so we get notifications), and we'll find another way to connect with you.

Saturday Jan. 30, 2pm Pacific / 5 PM Eastern (with Pete)
Tuesday Feb. 2, 5pm Pacific / 8pm Eastern (with Pete)
Wednesday Feb. 3, 12:30pm Pacific / 3:30 PM Eastern (with Sherry)
Thursday Feb. 4, 12:30pm Pacific / 3:30 PM Eastern (with Sherry)

We hope to hear from you soon! -Pete Forsyth (talk) 00:47, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Lynn Peterson (American politician) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Lynn Peterson (American politician). Thanks! Dan arndt (talk) 07:34, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lynn Peterson (American politician) has been accepted

Lynn Peterson (American politician), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Pete Forsyth (talk) 17:49, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Art to Tech (talk) 17:59, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Seattle Metro Homemaker

Hello, Art to Tech. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Seattle Metro Homemaker, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I took a look at your draft after your post to Talk:York (explorer). It has a few problems. First off, there is no significant coverage of the publication to establish notability. Second, only 2.25 sentences are about Seattle Metro Homemaker (I allowed .25 for Bennet being editor). Most of the text is about Bennet. I did a search for references and had no luck finding any significant coverage of Homemaker, but that's what you'll need to get the article accepted. I hope you can find some sources! Schazjmd (talk) 15:59, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Seattle Metro Homemaker has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Seattle Metro Homemaker. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 04:37, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seattle Metro Homemaker (August 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SL93 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Seattle Metro Homemaker and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Seattle Metro Homemaker, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SL93 (talk) 17:52, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Homemaker

Hi, I saw that Draft:Seattle Metro Homemaker was deleted at your request. It seems to me we (mostly you) did some good work there, and while it might be that the publication itself isn't sufficiently notable, maybe there's a way to work some of that content into a related article? Do you mind if I try to weave it in somewhere? (Don't have time to look closely right now, but I'm wondering if the founder/publisher might merit an article, and/or if a couple sentences about it could be added to the news group it's part of.) -Pete Forsyth (talk) 01:26, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please have a look, you are welcome to all the content. I was getting lots of messages about it. Art to Tech (talk) Ummm ... I may have created another draft when I was looking to see how it could be retrieved. <face palm>. Art to Tech (talk) 06:53, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jasilyn Charger (April 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There are only two references that go into any great detail about Charger, and even then the Rapid City piece isn't very long (the other source being the NYT piece, which is great). The other sources are fine for verification purposes with regard to her pipeline protests, but since they just mention her involvement (or are interviews/quotes) they doesn't really demonstrate the kind of notability that the guidelines are looking for. Please add additional independent reliable sources that discuss the subject in detail.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jasilyn Charger and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jasilyn Charger, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 11:07, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Primefac I plan to continue working on the article. Art to Tech (talk) 19:09, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]