User talk:Arsham1380

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! MPS1992 (talk) 18:51, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fatma Sultan

Hello fellow editor. Though I am not authorized to do this in any way, I believe I am not overstepping my limits by saying that I congratulate you on your work and that I thank you for contributing to our efforts to shed light into the lives of relatively unknown historical figures,like Fatma, and make the information accessible to a wider audience. I would also like to inform you that I made minor changes in this particular article. I corrected some minor grammar mistakes, I added some links as well as a bit more information from Uluçay's book, and finally I deleted the information about Fatma's birthplace and death date, since it was not cited (besides, Fatma being born at Manisa, would make her at least 19 at the time of her first marriage-alliance, which is a quite old age for Murad, who struggled with court fractions to marry her off in). It is just as necessary not to add uncited content as it is to thoroughly check a source's validity before editing the articles. If you could sometime find solid information about where Fatma was born and when she died it would be wonderful. Once again I thank you for your contribution. If you would like to contact me for any reason, you are welcome to do so, in my talk page. Chris Liak (talk) 16:54, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I just realised it was another editor that created the article about Fatma, silly me! I do feel however, judging by your editing history, that I should once again underline that you must not make major changes in articles without citations. The checking of the sources and by extention the editors' sense of responsibility is one of the pillars that keeps Wikipedia as we know it, namely the foremost trustworthy source of information for billions of people, standing. Chris Liak (talk) 17:43, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. - LouisAragon (talk) 22:01, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. - --Phso2 (talk) 13:52, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Editing

For months on, the Wikipedia community witnesses you making the same changes in articles about the Ottoman Dynasty over and over, without bothering to cite any reliable source and while completely disregarding the directions of other, more experienced users. Your behaviour has reached a breaking point. This is not simply disruptive editing, this is vandalism. If you keep doing it, I promise you, I WILL report you as many times as is necessary for the administrators to shut your account down. Wikipedia is regarded by billions as their foremost source of valid information and knowledge, therefore your ways cannot be tolerated anymore. Chris Liak (talk) 17:42, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for two weeks, with final warning before being blocked indefinitely

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Kralizec! (talk) 19:31, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of the mothers of the Safavid Shahs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Circassian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. 1) cross-article disruptive editing on a structural basis. 2) Never adding sources. 3) Never using edit summaries. 4) 0.0% improvement after the two weeks block. In other words; WP:NOTHERE. - LouisAragon (talk) 16:19, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Kralizec!: I see you already gave him the final warning very recently. Thought I should ping you. - LouisAragon (talk) 16:21, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Kralizec! (talk) 16:34, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arsham1380 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not want to disrupt the English wiki but want to help spread it. I am a student of Iranian history. I apologize and know that I was wrong. My page is locked for not being fluent in English. I can't use English Wikipedia resources because my page is locked, But I need these resources because I use them on other wikis Please help me and free my page. Arsham1380 (talk) 09:11, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You do not need to be unlocked to read Wikipedia. Yamla (talk) 12:08, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.