User talk:Arnbiology

Welcome!

Hi Arnbiology! I noticed your contributions to Philosophy of self and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Tacyarg (talk) 20:44, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Changing the definition in the first sentence

Hello Arnbiology, I saw that in various of your edits change the definition of a term in the first sentence of the article, often using rather unconventional definitions associated with process philosophy (for example, [1], [2], and [3]. Many of these (and others of your edits) were reverted. The lead section (and specifically the first sentence) is the most important part of an article and great care should be taken when modifying it. Its goal is to summarize the article and provide an overview of it, see WP:LEAD. If you want to introduce new contents and claims to the article, you should do so first in the body of the article and then, if those edits are accepted and the claims are important enough, add a summary to the lead. Wikipedia is a general encyclopedia, not an encyclopedia of process philosophy. So please make sure that you don't add claims and views belonging to process philosophy as if they were a universally accepted. Phlsph7 (talk) 06:24, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Arnbiology, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:15, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Liz, Please "Delete" my 'editing' of the 'original' PmWiki "Imagination philosophy" Article...Please do not "Delete" the original page; It is a existing PmWiki Thumbnail Article that I was trying to hyperlink the title of-for easier access to the Article.

In the discussion here, there seems some confusion about whether this is a Article or an edit...it's my editing that should be "Deleted"...I am moving to a sandbox to learn about Hyperlinking 'PmWiki Thumbnail Article Titles'. thanks, Arnie

... Arnbiology (talk) 16:09, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Imagination philosophy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Imagination philosophy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imagination philosophy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Asparagusus (interaction) 16:40, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks,:* This is a Copy of an original PmWiki Article page titled "Imagination philosophy", please check it out...

"Imagination philosophy" in Wikipedia can not be linked or cited...this was only an attempt at/to linking-citing it...

This is/was an attempt to move an existing reference page-To-Be-a new Article page...for citing and linking purposes...

This also was a response to 'Wiki discussion' about the Article "Imagination" combining related topics...

I'm sending this 'talk' to my sandbox for help, to make "Imagination philosophy" a Article some day.

Arnbiology (talk) 18:07, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Arnbiology. I know that you wanted to make a hyperlink for it, but a random collection of refs is not going to help explain the term. To do that, you actually have to write an article. Asparagusus (interaction) 18:26, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please check out the original PmWiki Article...it is an existing 'collection of refs'...I was trying to "hyperlink" the title only?...and then got interested in editing it. After deleting my editing...If you know how to hyperlink the original PmWiki Article Title, please do it. Arnbiology (talk) 20:20, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like you want us to add a hyperlink (from somewhere in English-language Wikipedia, you haven't specified where) to an article (whose URL you haven't provided) somewhere on pmwiki.org. Or maybe you want to add a hyperlink from somewhere in pmwiki.org to an article that hasn't been written, in en:Wikipedia? Can you explain clearly what it is that you're hoping to do? Maproom (talk) 08:18, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete please...This was an existing wiki promotion Article in Wikipedia? Apparently now in conflict with Wikipedia. I did not know this while I was trying to edit and link its title for easy access in Wikipedia. This is what I was hoping for, thanks Arnbiology (talk) 16:25, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently Deletion has been closed, thanks all... Arnbiology (talk) 18:07, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Test edits

Hello, I'm glad to see that you're interested in contributing to articles about philosophy! I wanted to let you know that no, chatboxes should never be used as sources on Wikipedia. It seems that many of your edits have changed wordings in a way that does not match Wikipedia's style and is not helpful in building the articles. If you need help with editing, I suggest you post any questions at the teahouse. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 19:30, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...Well said, 'Wikipedia's style' Thanks. Arnbiology (talk) 19:47, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Observation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Relation. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]